Lectures and presentations
Human capital and capabilities in language policy: using language to help people, or using people to help language? [Download link at the bottom of the page]


JYU experts related to activity

Is presenterYes


All expertsSayers, Dave


Activity details

AudienceScientific

Is open peer review?No

Nature of eventOther scientific event

Name of eventHuman capital, languages, and new literacies: Theories, policies, and impacts Fifth biannual interdisciplinary symposium of the RESEARCH GROUP “ECONOMICS, POLICY ANALYSIS, AND LANGUAGE” – REAL

Presentation typeOther public presentation

Start date03/06/2024

End date04/06/2024

Year2024


Description

This talk explores a fundamental but little discussed divergence within contemporary language policy, and contributes a new typology to bring clarity and coherence to the field.

On the one hand there are policies that aim exclusively to boost human capital by seeking out linguistic interventions that give people greater autonomy over their own lives, raising individuals’ life chances and ‘capabilities’. Ultimately this form of language policy is not strictly interested in language as such, only insofar as it delivers other human freedoms.

On the other hand there are policies that position language as an independently valuable entity, in need of protection and worthy of prioritisation whether or not this increases human capital. Ultimately the balance here is reversed: the focus is on language itself, not human freedoms.

Between these two extremes lies the complicated and diverse reality of much, if not most contemporary language policy: with a fascinating breadth of ideologies attached to both language and human capital.

But these extremes, and the spectrum of realities in between, are seldom clearly discussed. Indeed, minority language policy is often assumed to be inherently and unarguably emancipatory and freedom-enhancing. I argue that this assumption weakens our capacity to understand language policy and its link to human capital. I explore a range of case studies illustrating points between those two extremes, and I build towards a typology of ideologies to clearly identify the relative weighting of these end goals. The purpose is to give a simple gauge to identify these diverging goals within any given language policy, to add structure and coherence to our field of research.

Follow-up groupsSchool of Wellbeing (University of Jyväskylä JYU) JYU.WellSchool of Resource Wisdom (University of Jyväskylä JYU) JYU.WisdomTeacher education research (teaching, learning, teacher, learning paths, education) (University of Jyväskylä JYU) JYU.Edu; Formerly JYU.OpeBehaviour change, health, and well-being across the lifespan (University of Jyväskylä JYU) BC-Well

Profiling areasBehaviour change, health, and well-being across the lifespan (University of Jyväskylä JYU) BC-WellSchool of Wellbeing (University of Jyväskylä JYU) JYU.WellSchool of Resource Wisdom (University of Jyväskylä JYU) JYU.Wisdom

Keywords (YSO)linguistic rightslinguistic minoritieslanguage policycapability

Main country visitedSpain (ES)


JYU unit(s)


Related publication


Activity-related file (public)


Last updated on 2024-03-06 at 15:55