A1 Journal article (refereed)
Development of a Parkinson’s disease specific falls questionnaire (2021)


Harris, D. M., Duckham, R. L., Daly, R. M., Abbott, G., Johnson, L., Rantalainen, T., & Teo, W.-P. (2021). Development of a Parkinson’s disease specific falls questionnaire. BMC Geriatrics, 21, Article 614. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02555-6


JYU authors or editors


Publication details

All authors or editors: Harris, Dale M.; Duckham, Rachel L.; Daly, Robin M.; Abbott, Gavin; Johnson, Liam; Rantalainen, Timo; Teo, Wei-Peng

Journal or series: BMC Geriatrics

eISSN: 1471-2318

Publication year: 2021

Publication date: 30/10/2021

Volume: 21

Article number: 614

Publisher: Biomed Central

Publication country: United Kingdom

Publication language: English

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02555-6

Publication open access: Openly available

Publication channel open access: Open Access channel

Publication is parallel published (JYX): https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/78456


Abstract

Background
Falls are a major health burden for older adults with Parkinson’s disease (PD), but there is currently no reliable questionnaire to capture the circumstances and consequences of falls in older adults with PD. This study aimed to develop a PD-specific falls questionnaire and to evaluate its test-retest reliability in older adults with PD.

Methods
A novel PD-specific falls questionnaire (PDF-Q) was developed in two modes (online and paper-based version) and used to assess falls and near-falls events over the past 12-months. Questions were agreed upon by an expert group, with the domains based on previous falls-related questionnaires. The questions included the number and circumstances (activities, location and direction) of falls and near-falls, and consequences (injuries and medical treatment) of falls. The PDF-Q was distributed to 46 older adults with PD (online n = 30, paper n = 16), who completed the questionnaire twice, 4 weeks apart. Kappa (κ) statistics were used to establish test-retest reliability of the questionnaire items.

Results
Pooled results from both questionnaires for all participants were used to assess the overall test-retest reliability of the questionnaire. Questions assessing the number of falls (κ = 0.41) and the number of near-falls (κ = 0.51) in the previous 12-months demonstrated weak agreement, while questions on the location of falls (κ = 0.89) and near-falls (κ = 1.0) demonstrated strong to almost perfect agreement. Questions on the number of indoor (κ = 0.86) and outdoor (κ = 0.75) falls demonstrated moderate to strong agreement, though questions related to the number of indoor (κ = 0.47) and outdoor (κ = 0.56) near-falls demonstrated weak agreement. Moderate to strong agreement scores were observed for the most recent fall and near-fall in terms of the direction (indoor fall κ = 0.80; outdoor fall κ = 0.81; near-fall κ = 0.54), activity (indoor fall κ = 0.70; outdoor fall κ = 0.82; near-fall κ = 0.65) and cause (indoor fall κ = 0.75; outdoor fall κ = 0.62; near-fall κ = 0.56).

Conclusions
The new PDF-Q developed in this study was found to be reliable for capturing the circumstances and consequences of recent falls and near-falls in older adults with PD.


Keywords: older people; falling over; Parkinson's disease; questionnaire survey; reliability (science)

Free keywords: Parkinson’s disease; falls; near-falls; reliability; questionnaire


Contributing organizations


Ministry reporting: Yes

Preliminary JUFO rating: 2


Last updated on 2021-02-11 at 14:24