A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
A dual process model to predict adolescents’ screen time and physical activity (2023)


Aulbach, M. B., Konttinen, H., Gardner, B., Kujala, E., Araujo-Soares, V., Sniehotta, F. F., Lintunen, T., Haukkala, A., & Hankonen, N. (2023). A dual process model to predict adolescents’ screen time and physical activity. Psychology and Health, 38(7), 827-846. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2021.1988598


JYU-tekijät tai -toimittajat


Julkaisun tiedot

Julkaisun kaikki tekijät tai toimittajatAulbach, Matthias Burkard; Konttinen, Hanna; Gardner, Benjamin; Kujala, Emilia; Araujo-Soares, Vera; Sniehotta, Falko F.; Lintunen, Taru; Haukkala, Ari; Hankonen, Nelli

Lehti tai sarjaPsychology and Health

ISSN0887-0446

eISSN1476-8321

Julkaisuvuosi2023

Ilmestymispäivä18.10.2021

Volyymi38

Lehden numero7

Artikkelin sivunumerot827-846

KustantajaRoutledge

JulkaisumaaBritannia

Julkaisun kielienglanti

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2021.1988598

Julkaisun avoin saatavuusAvoimesti saatavilla

Julkaisukanavan avoin saatavuusOsittain avoin julkaisukanava

Julkaisu on rinnakkaistallennettu (JYX)https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/78621


Tiivistelmä

Objective
Many adolescents report a lack of physical activity (PA) and excess screen time (ST). Psychological theories aiming to understand these behaviours typically focus on predictors of only one behaviour. Yet, behaviour enactment is often a choice between options. This study sought to examine predictors of PA and ST in a single model. Variables were drawn from dual process models, which portray behaviour as the outcome of deliberative and automatic processes.

Design
411 Finnish vocational school students (age 17–19) completed a survey, comprising variables from the Reasoned Action Approach (RAA) and automaticity pertaining to PA and ST, and self-reported PA and ST four weeks later.

Main outcome measures
Self-reported time spent on PA and ST and their predictors.

Results
PA and ST correlated negatively (r = −.17, p = .03). Structural equation modelling revealed that intentions and habit for PA predicted PA while ST was predicted by intentions and habit for ST and negatively by PA intentions. RAA-cognitions predicted intentions.

Conclusion
PA and ST and their psychological predictors seem to be weakly interlinked. Future studies should assess more behaviours and related psychological influences to get a better picture of connections between different behaviours.


YSO-asiasanatnuoretammattikoululaisetterveyskäyttäytyminenkäyttäytymismallitintentiofyysinen aktiivisuusliikuntaruutuaikarakenneyhtälömallit

Vapaat asiasanatphysical activity; screen time; reasoned action approach; automaticity; structural equation modelling


Liittyvät organisaatiot


OKM-raportointiKyllä

Raportointivuosi2022

JUFO-taso2


Viimeisin päivitys 2024-22-04 klo 17:53