A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
When did biopolitics begin? : Actuality and potentiality in historical events (2022)
Prozorov, S. (2022). When did biopolitics begin? : Actuality and potentiality in historical events. European Journal of Social Theory, 25(4), 539-558. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310221077198
JYU-tekijät tai -toimittajat
Julkaisun tiedot
Julkaisun kaikki tekijät tai toimittajat: Prozorov, Sergei
Lehti tai sarja: European Journal of Social Theory
ISSN: 1368-4310
eISSN: 1461-7137
Julkaisuvuosi: 2022
Ilmestymispäivä: 03.02.2022
Volyymi: 25
Lehden numero: 4
Artikkelin sivunumerot: 539-558
Kustantaja: SAGE Publications
Julkaisumaa: Britannia
Julkaisun kieli: englanti
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310221077198
Julkaisun avoin saatavuus: Avoimesti saatavilla
Julkaisukanavan avoin saatavuus: Osittain avoin julkaisukanava
Julkaisu on rinnakkaistallennettu (JYX): https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/79707
Tiivistelmä
The article addresses the ongoing debate about the origins of biopolitics. While Foucault’s analysis of biopolitics approached it as a modern rationality of government, Agamben’s Homo Sacer series presented biopolitics as having a longer provenance, dating back to the antiquity. These polar positions are not mutually exclusive but coexist in these and other theories of biopolitics, which approach its object as both modern and ancient, having its chronological origin in the eighteenth to nineteenth centuries yet also possessing a prehistory of precursors. The article interprets this dual origin in terms of Paolo Virno’s theory of historical temporality, which distinguishes between the chronological past of historical events and their potential past, which accompanies and is negated in them. Coexisting with its own unrealized potential, every historical event remains incomplete and extends itself both backwards and forwards, positing its precursors and prefiguring its future outcomes. While modern in the chronological sense, biopolitics is retrospectively inscribed in a longer historical lineage, its antecedents easily identifiable in the history of political thought. Finally, we apply this approach to Virno’s own account of the history of biopolitics, questioning his identification of past potential with labour-power.
YSO-asiasanat: poliittinen filosofia; biopolitiikka; valta; suvereniteetti; temporaalisuus; käsitehistoria
Vapaat asiasanat: Agamben, Giorgio; Foucault, Michel; Virno, Paolo; Esposito, Roberto
Liittyvät organisaatiot
OKM-raportointi: Kyllä
VIRTA-lähetysvuosi: 2022
JUFO-taso: 2