A3 Book section, Chapters in research books
Argumentation in the Context of High School Mathematics : Examining Dialogic Aspects of Argumentation (2022)
Hähkiöniemi, M. (2022). Argumentation in the Context of High School Mathematics : Examining Dialogic Aspects of Argumentation. In K. N. Bieda, A. Conner, K. W. Kosko, & M. Staples (Eds.), Conceptions and Consequences of Mathematical Argumentation, Justification, and Proof (pp. 145-158). Springer. Research in Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80008-6_13
JYU authors or editors
Publication details
All authors or editors: Hähkiöniemi, Markus
Parent publication: Conceptions and Consequences of Mathematical Argumentation, Justification, and Proof
Parent publication editors: Bieda, Kristen N.; Conner, AnnaMarie; Kosko, Karl W.; Staples, Megan
ISBN: 978-3-030-80007-9
eISBN: 978-3-030-80008-6
Journal or series: Research in Mathematics Education
ISSN: 2570-4729
eISSN: 2570-4737
Publication year: 2022
Pages range: 145-158
Number of pages in the book: 333
Publisher: Springer
Place of Publication: Cham
Publication country: Switzerland
Publication language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80008-6_13
Publication open access: Not open
Publication channel open access:
Publication is parallel published (JYX): https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/81221
Abstract
In this chapter, I examine argumentation from the perspective of dialogic argumentation that highlights students’ engagement with each other’s ideas in the process of making mathematical claims and providing evidence to support them. I analyzed the provided data for students’ dialogic and justifying moves and investigated how the teacher supported argumentation. I found that the students’ dialogic moves included elaborating and commenting on peers’ ideas. Students’ justifying moves included one case of articulating reasoning and several instances of describing support. The teacher structured argumentation by sequencing it into steps so that each step established a new piece of information. This may have restricted students’ need to articulate reasoning and to challenge or ask questions about the presented ideas. The teacher’s dialogic communicative approach seemed to support students in elaborating each other’s ideas. On the other hand, use of an authoritative approach appeared to constrain students’ possibilities to provide support for claims. Considering dialogic aspects enriches the analysis or argumentation when argumentation is understood as a process as emphasized in the definition of argumentation used in this book.
Keywords: mathematics; general upper secondary school; class discussion (educational methods); argumentation; dialogicality; teachers
Free keywords: argumentation; communicative approach; dialogic argumentation; dialogue; interaction; mathematics education; teacher support
Contributing organizations
Related projects
- Teachers' orchestration of argumentation discussions in physics and mathematics lessons
- Viiri, Jouni
- Research Council of Finland
Ministry reporting: Yes
Reporting Year: 2022
JUFO rating: 2