A4 Article in conference proceedings
Process Support in MetaCASE : Implementing the Conceptual Basis for Enactable Process Models in MetaEdit+ (1997)


Koskinen, M., & Marttiin, P. (1997). Process Support in MetaCASE : Implementing the Conceptual Basis for Enactable Process Models in MetaEdit+. In J. Ebert, & C. Lewerentz (Eds.), Proceedings 8th Conference on Software Engineering Environments (pp. 110-123). IEEE computer society press. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEE.1997.591823


JYU authors or editors


Publication details

All authors or editorsKoskinen, Minna; Marttiin, Pentti

Parent publicationProceedings 8th Conference on Software Engineering Environments

Parent publication editorsEbert, Jürgen; Lewerentz, Claus

Place and date of conferenceCottbus, Germany08-09 April 1997

ISBN0-8186-8019-9

Publication year1997

Pages range110-123

Number of pages in the book173

PublisherIEEE computer society press

Place of PublicationLos Alamitos, California

Publication countryUnited States

Publication languageEnglish

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1109/SEE.1997.591823

Publication open accessNot open

Publication channel open access

Publication is parallel publishedhttps://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/829499.829885


Abstract

This study concerns the support of information system analysis and design process in a metaCASE environment. We see a process as highly, evolutionary and unstructural in nature, thus requiring the tailorability of user process models and their conceptual basis, process modelling language (PML). In addition to the flexibility needed for guiding various system developers, the CASE environment needs to be enacted using strictly defined environment actions. A distinction between user and environment processes is made, hence distinguishing also their conceptual basis and modelling requirements. The study depicts the realisation of the basic concepts and tools required in modelling a PML and the integration of user and environment process models in a metaCASE environment called MetaEdit+. The concepts and tools introduced aid in providing full customisability for a project to adapt its own PML for designing enactable process models. Finally, we briefly assess the benefits and weaknesses of our approach, and present our ongoing and future work related to this paper.


Keywordsdata systemssoftware designcomputer-aided designusersmodelling (representation)process management

Free keywordscomputer aided software engineering; user modelling; programming environments; information systems


Contributing organizations


Ministry reportingYes

Preliminary JUFO ratingNot rated


Last updated on 2024-12-03 at 15:15