A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
Individualized Endurance Training Based on Recovery and Training Status in Recreational Runners (2022)


Nuuttila, O.-P., Nummela, A., Korhonen, E., Häkkinen, K., & Kyröläinen, H. (2022). Individualized Endurance Training Based on Recovery and Training Status in Recreational Runners. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 54(10), 1690-1701. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002968


JYU-tekijät tai -toimittajat


Julkaisun tiedot

Julkaisun kaikki tekijät tai toimittajatNuuttila, Olli-Pekka; Nummela, Ari; Korhonen, Elisa; Häkkinen, Keijo; Kyröläinen, Heikki

Lehti tai sarjaMedicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

ISSN0195-9131

eISSN1530-0315

Julkaisuvuosi2022

Ilmestymispäivä13.08.2022

Volyymi54

Lehden numero10

Artikkelin sivunumerot1690-1701

KustantajaLippincott Williams & Wilkins

JulkaisumaaYhdysvallat (USA)

Julkaisun kielienglanti

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002968

Julkaisun avoin saatavuusAvoimesti saatavilla

Julkaisukanavan avoin saatavuusOsittain avoin julkaisukanava

Julkaisu on rinnakkaistallennettu (JYX)https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/83277


Tiivistelmä

Purpose
Long-term development of endurance performance requires a proper balance between strain and recovery. While responses and adaptations to training are highly individual, this study examined whether individually-adjusted endurance training based on recovery and training status would lead to greater adaptations compared to a predefined program.

Methods
Recreational runners were divided into predefined (PD, n = 14) or individualized (IND, n = 16) training groups. In IND, the training load was decreased, maintained or increased twice a week based on nocturnal heart rate variability, perceived recovery, and heart rate-running speed index. Both groups performed three-week preparatory, six-week volume and six-week interval periods. Incremental treadmill tests and 10 km running tests were performed before the preparatory period (T0) and after the preparatory (T1), volume (T2), and interval (T3) periods. The magnitude of training adaptations was defined based on the coefficient of variation between T0 and T1 tests (high >2 x, low <0.5 x).

Results
Both groups improved (p < 0.01) their maximal treadmill speed (vMax) and 10 km time from T1 to T3. The change in the 10 km time was greater in IND compared to PD (-6.2 ± 2.8 % vs. -2.9 ± 2.4 %, p = 0.002). In addition, IND had more high responders (50 vs. 29 %) and fewer low responders (0 vs. 21 %) compared to PD in the change of vMax and 10 km performance (81 vs. 23% and 13 vs. 23 %) respectively.

Conclusions
PD and IND induced positive training adaptations, but the individualized training seemed more beneficial in endurance performance. Moreover, IND increased the likelihood of high response and decreased the occurrence of low-response to endurance training.


YSO-asiasanatkestävyysharjoittelujuoksusuorituskykypalautuminenyksilöllistäminenjaksotusharjoittelusykekuntoliikunta

Vapaat asiasanatendurance performance; running performance; heart rate variability; perceived recovery; periodization


Liittyvät organisaatiot


Hankkeet, joissa julkaisu on tehty


Liittyvät tutkimusaineistot


OKM-raportointiKyllä

Raportointivuosi2022

JUFO-taso3


Viimeisin päivitys 2024-15-06 klo 21:25