A3 Book section, Chapters in research books
Radical Besinnung as a Method for Phenomenological Critique (2022)


Hartimo, M. (2022). Radical Besinnung as a Method for Phenomenological Critique. In S. A. Aldea, D. Carr, & S. Heinämaa (Eds.), Phenomenology as Critique : Why Method Matters (pp. 80-94). Routledge. Routledge Research in Phenomenology. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003191483-6


JYU authors or editors


Publication details

All authors or editorsHartimo, Mirja

Parent publicationPhenomenology as Critique : Why Method Matters

Parent publication editorsAldea, Smaranda Andreea; Carr, David; Heinämaa, Sara

ISBN978-1-032-01511-8

eISBN978-1-003-19148-3

Journal or seriesRoutledge Research in Phenomenology

Publication year2022

Publication date18/02/2022

Pages range80-94

Number of pages in the book292

PublisherRoutledge

Place of PublicationNew York

Publication countryUnited States

Publication languageEnglish

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781003191483-6

Publication open accessNot open

Publication channel open access

Publication is parallel published (JYX)https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/83591

Publication is parallel publishedhttps://philarchive.org/rec/HARRBA-6


Abstract

The chapter discusses Husserl’s method of historical reflection, radical Besinnung, as defined and used in Formale und transzendentale Logik (1929). Whereas Formal and Transcendental Logic introduces and displays Husserl’s usage of Besinnung in the context of the exact sciences, the chapter seeks to develop it as a more general critical method with which to approach any rational goal-directed activity. Husserl defines Besinnung as a method that enables understanding agents and their actions by explicating agents’ typically implicit goals. It leads to the inclusion of historical-teleological activities as part of Husserl’s natural understanding of the world. The transcendental reflection radicalizes Besinnung by clarifying the kinds of evidence sought for in activities and then suggesting revisions to the concepts and principles used. The result is inner critique, which means that the activities are criticized against the norms that arise from reflection on these activities themselves, and not from a comparison with external standards or measures.


Keywordsphenomenologyphilosophy of sciencemethodologyconsciousness (mental properties)human agencyreflection (cognitive processes)transcendence (being)

Free keywordsHusserl, Edmund

Fields of science:


Contributing organizations


Ministry reportingYes

VIRTA submission year2022

JUFO rating3


Last updated on 2024-12-10 at 14:15