A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
NGO Legitimacy as a Continuous Negotiation Process : Fostering ‘Good Citizenship’ in Western Uganda (2022)

Kontinen, T., & Bananuka, T. H. (2022). NGO Legitimacy as a Continuous Negotiation Process : Fostering ‘Good Citizenship’ in Western Uganda. Nordic Journal of African Studies, 31(4), 350-373. https://doi.org/10.53228/njas.v31i4.963

JYU-tekijät tai -toimittajat

Kontinen, Tiina

Julkaisun tiedot

Julkaisun kaikki tekijät tai toimittajat: Kontinen, Tiina; Bananuka, Twine Hannington

Lehti tai sarja: Nordic Journal of African Studies

ISSN: 1235-4481

eISSN: 1459-9465

Julkaisuvuosi: 2022

Ilmestymispäivä: 12.12.2022

Volyymi: 31

Lehden numero: 4

Artikkelin sivunumerot: 350-373

Kustantaja: Nordic Africa Research Network

Julkaisumaa: Ruotsi

Julkaisun kieli: englanti

DOI: https://doi.org/10.53228/njas.v31i4.963

Julkaisun avoin saatavuus: Avoimesti saatavilla

Julkaisukanavan avoin saatavuus: Kokonaan avoin julkaisukanava

Julkaisu on rinnakkaistallennettu (JYX): https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/84493

Lisätietoja: Special issue: Citizenship in Uganda

Tiivistelmä

The article draws on and contributes to debates on the legitimacy of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) engaged in development, defining organizational legitimacy as a social construct that is continually negotiated in relationships with diverse audiences. To explore the negotiated nature of NGO legitimacy, the article examines the efforts of a Ugandan NGO, Kabarole Research and Resource Centre (KRC), to foster citizens’ capacities in rural communities in the western part of the country. Drawing on interviews and participant observation, we scrutinize the ways in which KRC balances between different and even contrasting legitimacy expectations stemming from three types of encounters significant to the NGO: those with international collaborators, community members, and local government. We show how international collaborators prioritize support for active citizenship, manifested in mobilizing to claim rights and accountability; village residents emphasize good citizenship, comprising a secure livelihood and community contributions; and local government endorses citizenship characterized by fulfilling obligations. The NGO must balance between those expectations to secure funding, fulfil their empowerment mission, and maintain their ability to act without restrictions. In conclusion, the article argues for a notion of NGO legitimacy as a state of continual negotiation, wherein the specificities of significant audiences and the nature of the negotiations vary, based on the activities and contexts of any particular development NGO.

YSO-asiasanat: kansalaisjärjestöt; kansalaisuus; afrikkalaisuus; legitimiteetti; yhteisöt; kansalaistoiminta; neuvottelut; kehitysyhteistyö; kehitystutkimus