A1 Journal article (refereed)
Idiosyncratic effects of coinfection on the association between systemic pathogens and the gut microbiota of a wild rodent, the bank vole Myodes glareolus (2023)
Brila, I., Lavrinienko, A., Tukalenko, E., Kallio, E. R., Mappes, T., & Watts, P. C. (2023). Idiosyncratic effects of coinfection on the association between systemic pathogens and the gut microbiota of a wild rodent, the bank vole Myodes glareolus. Journal of Animal Ecology, 92(4), 826-837. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13869
JYU authors or editors
Publication details
All authors or editors: Brila, Ilze; Lavrinienko, Anton; Tukalenko, Eugene; Kallio, Eva R.; Mappes, Tapio; Watts, Phillip C.
Journal or series: Journal of Animal Ecology
ISSN: 0021-8790
eISSN: 1365-2656
Publication year: 2023
Publication date: 12/12/2022
Volume: 92
Issue number: 4
Pages range: 826-837
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Publication country: United Kingdom
Publication language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13869
Publication open access: Not open
Publication channel open access: Channel is not openly available
Publication is parallel published (JYX): https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/93072
Abstract
We examined the effects of four systemic pathogens (bacteria Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, apicomplexan protozoa Babesia microti and Puumala orthohantavirus) and coinfections among them on the (bacterial) gut microbiota of wild bank voles Myodes glareolus.
We hypothesized that: (1) the effects of coinfection on gut microbiota generally differ from those of a single pathogen infection, (2) systemic pathogens have individual (i.e. distinct) associations with gut microbiota, which are modified by coinfection and (3) the effects of coinfection (compared with those of single infection) are idiosyncratic (i.e. pathogen-specific).
The gut microbiota of coinfected bank voles differed from that of single pathogen infected individuals, although, as predicted, the effects of coinfections were unique for each pathogen. After accounting for coinfections, only Puumala orthohantavirus was associated with higher α-diversity; however, all pathogens affected gut microbiota ß-diversity in a pathogen-specific way, affecting both rare and abundant gut bacteria.
Our results showed that the effects of systemic pathogens on host's gut microbiota vary depending on the pathogen species, resulting in idiosyncratic signatures of coinfection. Furthermore, our results emphasize that neglecting the impact of coinfections can mask patterns of pathogen–microbiota associations.
Keywords: bacteria; pathogens; Apicomplexa; gastrointestinal microbiota; viruses
Free keywords: Apicomplexa; bacteria; coinfection; disease ecology; gut microbiota; host–pathogen interactions; pathogens; virus
Contributing organizations
Related projects
- Ionisoivan säteilyn evolutiiviset vaikut
- Mappes, Tapio
- Research Council of Finland
- The ‘starving’ bank voles of Chernobyl: adaptation to- or consequence of- a poor environment?
- Mappes, Tapio
- Research Council of Finland
- Drivers of zoonotic tick-borne pathogens in natural populations research costs
- Kallio, Eva
- Research Council of Finland
- Drivers of zoonotic tick-borne pathogens in natural populations
- Kallio, Eva
- Research Council of Finland
- WILD HEALTH: How does environmental biodiversity affect wildlife health? (Watts)
- Watts, Phillip
- Research Council of Finland
- Drivers of zoonotic tick-borne pathogens in natural populations (research cost, second period)
- Kallio, Eva
- Research Council of Finland
Ministry reporting: Yes
VIRTA submission year: 2022
JUFO rating: 2