A3 Book section, Chapters in research books
From Legal Fiction to Collective Agency : Contemporary Arguments for Collective Personhood (2023)
Hirvonen, O. (2023). From Legal Fiction to Collective Agency : Contemporary Arguments for Collective Personhood. In J. Pelletier, & C. Rode (Eds.), The Reality of the Social World : Medieval, Early Modern, and Contemporary Perspectives on Social Ontology (12, pp. 159-177). Springer. Historical-Analytical Studies on Nature, Mind and Action. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23984-7_9
JYU authors or editors
Publication details
All authors or editors: Hirvonen, Onni
Parent publication: The Reality of the Social World : Medieval, Early Modern, and Contemporary Perspectives on Social Ontology
Parent publication editors: Pelletier, Jenny; Rode, Christian
ISBN: 978-3-031-23983-0
eISBN: 978-3-031-23984-7
Journal or series: Historical-Analytical Studies on Nature, Mind and Action
ISSN: 2509-4793
eISSN: 2509-4807
Publication year: 2023
Volume: 12
Pages range: 159-177
Number of pages in the book: 226
Publisher: Springer
Place of Publication: Cham
Publication country: Switzerland
Publication language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23984-7_9
Publication open access: Not open
Publication channel open access: Channel is not openly available
Publication is parallel published (JYX): https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/86422
Abstract
In our everyday language, groups are described as if they had intentions, beliefs, attitudes, rights, and responsibilities. This practice of group personification is especially prevalent in the legal context where corporations are taken to be fully capable legal entities. It is not difficult to find similar references to group personhood in the so-called canon of Western philosophy either (e.g. Hobbes, Rousseau, and Hegel). However, when we get to the latter half of the twentieth century, more individualistic notions of personhood have come to the fore. This paper focuses on three contemporary theories—by Peter French, by Carol Rovane, and by Christian List and Philip Pettit—that go against this common trend and argue for a robust group personhood. They all argue for the group personhood through collective rationality, shared purposes, group decision-making, and social performances. To what end though? On the one hand, their arguments want to place responsibility and blameworthiness at the group level as well. On the other hand, their aim is to map out the metaphysical conditions of personhood. Analysis of group personhood is an attempt to clear up the concept of personhood, which can have interesting consequences for our thinking about the (legal) status of social robots and animals as well.
Keywords: rationality; recognition; intentionality; human agency; collective action
Free keywords: group personhood; rationality; collective intentionality; Hegel; multi-dimensional account of personhood; recognition
Contributing organizations
Ministry reporting: Yes
VIRTA submission year: 2023
JUFO rating: 2