A1 Journal article (refereed)
Optimus vir, optima lex : A Medieval Debate on the Soul of a City (2023)


Chen, Z. (2023). Optimus vir, optima lex : A Medieval Debate on the Soul of a City. Studi sull’Aristotelismo medievale (secoli VI-XVI), 3, 31-85.


JYU authors or editors


Publication details

All authors or editorsChen, Zi'ang

Journal or seriesStudi sull’Aristotelismo medievale (secoli VI-XVI)

ISSN2785-5066

eISSN2974-7198

Publication year2023

Volume3

Pages range31-85

PublisherGruppo editoriale Tab

Publication countryItaly

Publication languageEnglish

Publication open accessNot open

Publication channel open access

Publication is parallel published (JYX)https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/93088


Abstract

This paper studies a series of thirteenth- and fourteenth-century scholastic discussions on Aristotle’s “vexed question” of whether the best law or the best man should govern. The paper examines arguments in favour of law by Tomas Aquinas and Godfrey of Fontaines, and the more absolutist arguments from Peter of Auvergne and Giles of Rome, before turning to the theological solutions from the Franciscans Gerald Odonis and Francis of Meyronnes. The paper offers fresh insight into the scholarly debate through a prism of medieval moral psychology and situates the political question within a broader theological framework. A critical edition of Odonis’s Ethics commentary question is presented in the appendix.


KeywordsMiddle Agespoliticspolitical theologyethicsvirtuesFranciscans

Free keywordspolitics; ethics; law; common good; virtue; political theology; Franciscan


Contributing organizations


Ministry reportingYes

Reporting Year2023

JUFO rating1


Last updated on 2024-15-05 at 13:34