A1 Journal article (refereed)
Does size‐selective harvesting erode adaptive potential to thermal stress? (2024)


Sadler, D. E., van Dijk, S., Karjalainen, J., Watts, P. C., & Uusi‐Heikkilä, S. (2024). Does size‐selective harvesting erode adaptive potential to thermal stress?. Ecology and Evolution, 14(2), Article e11007. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.11007


JYU authors or editors


Publication details

All authors or editorsSadler, Daniel E.; van Dijk, Stephan; Karjalainen, Juha; Watts, Phillip C.; Uusi‐Heikkilä, Silva

Journal or seriesEcology and Evolution

ISSN2045-7758

eISSN2045-7758

Publication year2024

Volume14

Issue number2

Article numbere11007

PublisherJohn Wiley & Sons

Publication countryUnited Kingdom

Publication languageEnglish

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.11007

Publication open accessOpenly available

Publication channel open accessOpen Access channel

Publication is parallel published (JYX)https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/93535


Abstract

Overharvesting is a serious threat to many fish populations. High mortality and directional selection on body size can cause evolutionary change in exploited populations via selection for a specific phenotype and a potential reduction in phenotypic diversity. Whether the loss of phenotypic diversity that accompanies directional selection impairs response to environmental stress is not known. To address this question, we exposed three zebrafish selection lines to thermal stress. Two lines had experienced directional selection for (1) large and (2) small body size, and one was (3) subject to random removal of individuals with respect to body size (i.e. line with no directional selection). Selection lines were exposed to three temperatures (elevated, 34°C; ambient, 28°C; low, 22°C) to determine the response to an environmental stressor (thermal stress). We assessed differences among selection lines in their life history (growth and reproduction), physiological traits (metabolic rate and critical thermal max) and behaviour (activity and feeding behaviour) when reared at different temperatures. Lines experiencing directional selection (i.e. size selected) showed reduced growth rate and a shift in average phenotype in response to lower or elevated thermal stress compared with fish from the random-selected line. Our data indicate that populations exposed to directional selection can have a more limited capacity to respond to thermal stress compared with fish that experience a comparable reduction in population size (but without directional selection). Future studies should aim to understand the impacts of environmental stressors on natural fish stocks.


Keywordsdiversityfishesfish populationszebra fishpopulationsphenotype

Free keywordsadaptive potential; fisheries; phenotypic diversity; size selection; thermal stress


Contributing organizations


Related projects


Ministry reportingYes

Preliminary JUFO rating1


Last updated on 2024-25-03 at 08:14