A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
Research Ethics Committee and Integrity Board Members’ Collaborative Decision Making in Cases in a Training Setting (2024)


Löfström, E., Pitkänen, H., Čekanauskaitė, A., Lukaševičienė, V., Kyllönen, S., & Gefenas, E. (2024). Research Ethics Committee and Integrity Board Members’ Collaborative Decision Making in Cases in a Training Setting. Journal of Academic Ethics, Early online. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09521-y


JYU-tekijät tai -toimittajat


Julkaisun tiedot

Julkaisun kaikki tekijät tai toimittajatLöfström, E.; Pitkänen, H.; Čekanauskaitė, A.; Lukaševičienė, V.; Kyllönen, S.; Gefenas, E.

Lehti tai sarjaJournal of Academic Ethics

ISSN1570-1727

eISSN1572-8544

Julkaisuvuosi2024

Ilmestymispäivä04.04.2024

VolyymiEarly online

KustantajaSpringer Science and Business Media LLC

JulkaisumaaAlankomaat

Julkaisun kielienglanti

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09521-y

Julkaisun avoin saatavuusAvoimesti saatavilla

Julkaisukanavan avoin saatavuusOsittain avoin julkaisukanava

Julkaisu on rinnakkaistallennettu (JYX)https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/94666


Tiivistelmä

This research focuses on how research ethics committee and integrity board members discuss and decide on solutions to case scenarios that involve a dimension of research ethics or integrity in collaborative settings. The cases involved issues around authorship, conflict of interest, disregard of good scientific practice and ethics review, and research with vulnerable populations (children and neonates). The cases were set in a university, a hospital, or a research institute. In the research, we used a deductive qualitative approach with thematic analysis. Twenty-seven research ethics committee and research integrity board members from 16 European countries and one country outside Europe participated. Participants represented natural and life sciences, social sciences, and humanities. They worked on cases involving ethical/integrity issues in six different constellations. Results show that experts apply key elements of ethical decision making, namely identification of ethical issues, stakeholders, guidelines, solutions, and own positionality, in dealing collaboratively with ethics/ integrity problems, and the nature of the application depends on the complexity of the case. Understanding how individuals knowledgeable in research ethics and integrity, in this case, individuals serving on research ethics committees and integrity boards, approach ethical/ moral issues can help to identify strategies that may be useful in the development of research ethics and integrity training for junior researchers who may benefit from learning professional strategies.


YSO-asiasanattutkimusetiikkaneuvottelukunnattyöryhmätpäätöksentekoyhteistyö

Vapaat asiasanatresearch ethics; research integrity; research ethics committee members; integrity board members; ethical decision making; collaboration; cases


Liittyvät organisaatiot

JYU-yksiköt:


OKM-raportointiKyllä

Raportointivuosi2024

Alustava JUFO-taso1


Viimeisin päivitys 2024-13-05 klo 18:25