A1 Journal article (refereed)
Ventilatory threshold during incremental running can be estimated using EMG shorts (2012)


Tikkanen, O., Hu, M., Vilavuo, T., Tolvanen, P., Cheng, S., & Finni Juutinen, T. (2012). Ventilatory threshold during incremental running can be estimated using EMG shorts. Physiological Measurement, 33, 603-614. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/33/4/603


JYU authors or editors


Publication details

All authors or editorsTikkanen, Olli; Hu, Min; Vilavuo, Toivo; Tolvanen, Pekka; Cheng, Sulin; Finni Juutinen, Taija

Journal or seriesPhysiological Measurement

ISSN0967-3334

eISSN1361-6579

Publication year2012

Volume33

Pages range603–614

PublisherIOP Publishing

Publication countryUnited Kingdom

Publication languageEnglish

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/33/4/603

Publication open accessNot open

Publication channel open access


Abstract

The present study examined whether shorts with textile electromyographic (EMG) electrodes can be used to detect second ventilatory threshold (V(T2)) during incremental treadmill running. Thirteen recreationally active (REC) and eight endurance athletes were measured for EMG, heart rate, blood lactate and respiratory gases during VO(2max) test (3 min ramps, 1 km·h(-1) increments). V(T)(2), onset of blood lactate accumulation (OBLA) and EMG threshold (EMG(T)) were determined. In athletes, OBLA occurred at 56 ± 6 mL·kg(-1)·min(-1), V(T2) occurred at 59 ± 6 mL·kg(-1)·min(-1), and EMG(T) at 62 ± 6 mL·kg(-1)·min(-1) without significant differences between methods (analysis of variance: ANOVA). In REC participants, OBLA occurred at 40 ± 10 mL·kg(-1)·min(-1), V(T2) occurred at 43 ± 7 mL·kg(-1)·min(-1), and EMG(T) at 41 ± 9 mL·kg(-1)·min(-1) without significant differences between methods (ANOVA). For the entire group, correlation between EMG(T) and V(T2) was 0.86 (P < 0.001) and 0.84 (P < 0.001) between EMG(T) and OBLA. Limits of agreement between EMG(T) and V(T2) were narrower in athletes than in REC participants. Thus, it is concluded that estimation of V(T2) using EMG(T) in athletes is more valid than in REC participants. In practice, experienced runners could use online feedback from EMG garments to monitor whether their running intensity is near V(T2).


Keywordssmart textilestreadmillsmeasuring technologyelectromyographylong-distance runningtrainingoxygen uptaketracking


Contributing organizations


Ministry reportingYes

Reporting Year2012

JUFO rating1


Last updated on 2023-14-12 at 11:07