A1 Journal article (refereed)
Sexual selection on song and cuticular hydrocarbons in two distinct populations of Drosophila montana (2012)


Veltsos, P., Wicker-Thomas, C., Butlin, R., Hoikkala, A., & Ritchie, M. (2012). Sexual selection on song and cuticular hydrocarbons in two distinct populations of Drosophila montana. Ecology and Evolution, 2(1), 80-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.75


JYU authors or editors


Publication details

All authors or editorsVeltsos, Paris; Wicker-Thomas, Claude; Butlin, Roger; Hoikkala, Anneli; Ritchie, Michael

Journal or seriesEcology and Evolution

ISSN2045-7758

eISSN2045-7758

Publication year2012

Volume2

Issue number1

Pages range80-94

PublisherWiley-Blackwell

Publication countryUnited States

Publication languageEnglish

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.75

Research data linkhttps://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.6df154sg

Publication open accessOpenly available

Publication channel open accessOpen Access channel

Publication is parallel published (JYX)https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/40601


Abstract

Sexual selection has the potential to contribute to population divergence and speciation. Most studies of sexual selection in Drosophila have concentrated on a single signaling modality, usually either courtship song or cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs), which can act as contact pheromones. We have examined the relationship between both signal types and reproductive success using F1–3 offspring of wild‐collected flies, raised in the lab. We used two populations of the Holarctic species Drosophila montana that represent different phylogeographic clades that have been separate for ca. 0.5 million years (MY), and differ to some extent in both traits. Here, we characterize the nature and identify the targets of sexual selection on song, CHCs, and both traits combined within the populations. Three measures of courtship outcome were used as fitness proxies. They were the probability of mating, mating latency, and the production of rejection song by females, and showed patterns of association with different traits that included both linear and quadratic selection. Courtship song predicted courtship outcome better than CHCs and the signal modalities acted in an additive rather than synergistic manner. Selection was generally consistent in direction and strength between the two populations and favored males that sang more vigorously. Sexual selection differed in the extent, strength, and nature on some of the traits between populations. However, the differences in the directionality of selection detected were not a good predictor of population differences. In addition, a character previously shown to be important for species recognition, interpulse interval, was found to be under sexual selection. Our results highlight the complexity of understanding the relationship between within‐population sexual selection and population differences. Sexual selection alone cannot predict differences between populations.


Keywordssexual selection

Free keywordsCourtship song; cuticular hydrocarbons; Drosophila montana; selection analysis


Contributing organizations


Ministry reportingYes

VIRTA submission year2012

JUFO rating1


Last updated on 2024-08-05 at 20:06