A1 Journal article (refereed)
Current agri-environmental policies dismiss varied perceptions and discourses on management of traditional rural biotopes (2017)


Raatikainen, K., & Barron, E. S. (2017). Current agri-environmental policies dismiss varied perceptions and discourses on management of traditional rural biotopes. Land Use Policy, 69, 564-576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.004


JYU authors or editors


Publication details

All authors or editorsRaatikainen, Kaisa; Barron, Elizabeth S.

Journal or seriesLand Use Policy

ISSN0264-8377

eISSN1873-5754

Publication year2017

Volume69

Issue number0

Pages range564-576

PublisherElsevier

Publication countryNetherlands

Publication languageEnglish

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.004

Publication open accessNot open

Publication channel open access

Publication is parallel published (JYX)https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/56154


Abstract

Traditional rural biotopes (TRBs) are threatened habitats that host significant biodiversity and several ecosystem services, and depend on active management such as low-intensity grazing. The current study explores private landowners’ decision-making on TRB management and abandonment within a social-ecological system framework. We provide insight into supporting resilience of TRB systems in the face of agricultural modernization. Using a mixed methods approach with content analysis and Q analysis, we demonstrate that TRB management fosters cultural, biological, aesthetic, and utilitarian values. These are reflected in different ways through conservationist's, profit-oriented farmer's, landscape manager's, and landscape admirer's discourses on TRB management. Overall, management reinforces landowners’ place attachment, and reflects an approach to landscapes as spatial representations of cultural heritage and identity over multiple generations. Landowners consider TRB pasturage and its social-ecological outcomes motivating and rewarding. Giving up grazing cattle and perceived bureaucracy of national agri-environment scheme contribute to TRB abandonment. Landowners point out that current policies detach TRB management from what is seen as “regular agriculture”, and the focus on monetary compensation bypasses the multiple values tied to TRB management. Based on our results, we suggest that promoting TRBs requires reconfiguring the current arrangement of remedial management payments and adopting a more participatory governance approach. Locally, resilience of TRB systems relies on the connections between landowners and landscapes that foster sense of place and landscape identity, which can be supported by knowledge sharing and collaborative grazing efforts among landowners.


Keywordstraditional biotopenature valuescultural heritageecosystem servicespasture rearinglandownersresilienceagricultural policy

Free keywordscultural ecosystem services; Finland; high-nature-value farming; semi-natural habitats; social-ecological systems


Contributing organizations

Other organizations:


Related projects


Ministry reportingYes

Reporting Year2017

JUFO rating2


Last updated on 2024-08-01 at 20:32