A1 Journal article (refereed)
Comparing the outcomes of two different approaches to CEFR-based rating of students’ writing performances across two European countries (2018)


Holzknecht, F., Huhta, A., & Lamprianou, I. (2018). Comparing the outcomes of two different approaches to CEFR-based rating of students’ writing performances across two European countries. Assessing Writing, 37, 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.009


JYU authors or editors


Publication details

All authors or editors: Holzknecht, Franz; Huhta, Ari; Lamprianou, Iasonas

Journal or series: Assessing Writing

ISSN: 1075-2935

eISSN: 1873-5916

Publication year: 2018

Volume: 37

Issue number: 0

Pages range: 57-67

Publisher: Pergamon Press

Publication country: United Kingdom

Publication language: English

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.009

Publication open access: Not open

Publication channel open access:

Publication is parallel published (JYX): https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/64513


Keywords: language skills; writing; evaluation; Rasch model

Free keywords: CEFR levels; assessing writing; rating scales; rater effects


Contributing organizations


Ministry reporting: Yes

Reporting Year: 2018

JUFO rating: 2


Last updated on 2021-20-09 at 15:35