A1 Journal article (refereed)
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Finnish Version of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (2020)
Hulkkonen, S., Repo, J. P., Häkkinen, A., Karppinen, J., & Ryhänen, J. (2020). Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Finnish Version of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery, 109(2), 159-165. https://doi.org/10.1177/1457496918818981
JYU authors or editors
Publication details
All authors or editors: Hulkkonen, S.; Repo, J. P.; Häkkinen, Arja; Karppinen, J.; Ryhänen, J.
Journal or series: Scandinavian Journal of Surgery
ISSN: 1457-4969
eISSN: 1799-7267
Publication year: 2020
Volume: 109
Issue number: 2
Pages range: 159-165
Publisher: Sage Publications; Finnish Surgical Society
Publication country: United Kingdom
Publication language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1457496918818981
Publication open access: Not open
Publication channel open access:
Publication is parallel published (JYX): https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/69790
Abstract
Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire is a widely used patient-reported outcome measure in hand surgery. The aim of this study was to translate and validate the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire into Finnish for Finnish patients with hand problems following international standards and guidelines.
Material and Methods:
The original English Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire was translated into Finnish. Altogether, 115 patients completed the Finnish Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, and reference outcomes: Disabilities of the Arm and Shoulder, EQ-5D 3L and pain intensity on a visual analog scale. Grip and key pinch forces were measured. After 1–2 weeks, 63 patients completed the Finnish Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire the second time. The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire was analyzed for internal consistency, repeatability, correlations with the reference outcomes, and factor analysis.
Results:
Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.90 to 0.97 in all the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire subscales, showing high internal consistency. The intraclass correlation coefficient showed good to excellent test–retest reliability ranging from 0.66 to 0.91 in all the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire subscales. In factor analysis, the structure with six subscales was not confirmed. All the subscales correlated with Disabilities of the Arm and Shoulder score, and five subscales correlated with EQ-5D index.
Conclusion:
The Finnish version of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire showed similar properties compared to the original English version and thus can be used as patient-reported outcome measure for Finnish patients with hand problems.
Keywords: factor analysis; hands; patients; quality of life; translations
Free keywords: patient-reported outcome measures
Contributing organizations
Ministry reporting: Yes
Reporting Year: 2020
JUFO rating: 1
