A1 Journal article (refereed)
Early prediction of reading trajectories of children with and without reading instruction in kindergarten : a comparison study of Estonia and Finland (2019)


Torppa, M., Soodla, P., Lerkkanen, M.-K., & Kikas, E. (2019). Early prediction of reading trajectories of children with and without reading instruction in kindergarten : a comparison study of Estonia and Finland. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 389-410. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12274


JYU authors or editors


Publication details

All authors or editors: Torppa, Minna; Soodla, Piret; Lerkkanen, Marja-Kristiina; Kikas, Eve

Journal or series: Journal of Research in Reading

ISSN: 0141-0423

eISSN: 1467-9817

Publication year: 2019

Volume: 42

Issue number: 2

Pages range: 389-410

Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Publication country: United Kingdom

Publication language: English

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12274

Publication open access: Not open

Publication channel open access:

Publication is parallel published (JYX): https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/64099


Abstract

Background: The present study examined differences in the prediction of reading development and reading difficulties in Estonia (n = 348) and Finland (n = 344). These neighbouring countries share many similarities in terms of their language, orthography and educational system; however, they differ in the timing of the onset of reading instruction, which is kindergarten in Estonia and Grade 1 in Finland.

Methods: Children's skills were assessed three times – fall and spring in Grade 1 and spring in Grade 2.

Results: The results showed that school‐entry rapid automatised naming and reading fluency predicted the development of fluency in Grade 2, but reading fluency was a stronger predictor in Estonia than in Finland. In addition, school‐entry reading fluency was the strongest predictor of reading comprehension in Grade 2. Furthermore, listening comprehension was a stronger predictor of reading comprehension in the Finnish sample than in the Estonian sample. Finally, high‐risk children were identified based on their slow reading and rapid automatised naming at school entry. In Estonia, the reading development of high‐risk children was declining compared to their peers, while the Finnish high‐risk children were catching up with their peers. The high‐risk children in the Finnish sample also had reading difficulties less often than the Estonian sample.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that the skills at school entry are stronger predictors of reading development in Estonia than in Finland. The reasons for this could be the earlier onset of reading instruction in kindergarten in the Estonian sample or differences in reading instruction practices between Estonian and Finnish schools.


Keywords: literacy; fluency; preschool education; lower comprehensive school pupils

Free keywords: Estonia; Finland


Contributing organizations


Related projects


Ministry reporting: Yes

Reporting Year: 2019

JUFO rating: 2


Last updated on 2023-15-02 at 08:59