A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
Explaining the Difference between Policy-Based Evidence and Evidence-Based Policy : A Nexus Analysis Approach to Mobilities and Migration (2019)
Aarnikoivu, M., Korhonen, S., Habti, D., & Hoffman, D. (2019). Explaining the Difference between Policy-Based Evidence and Evidence-Based Policy : A Nexus Analysis Approach to Mobilities and Migration. Journal of Finnish Studies, 22(1-2), 213-240. https://doi.org/10.5406/28315081.22.1.2.12
JYU-tekijät tai -toimittajat
Julkaisun tiedot
Julkaisun kaikki tekijät tai toimittajat: Aarnikoivu, Melina; Korhonen, Sirpa; Habti, Driss; Hoffman, David
Lehti tai sarja: Journal of Finnish Studies
ISSN: 1206-6516
eISSN: 2831-5081
Julkaisuvuosi: 2019
Volyymi: 22
Lehden numero: 1-2
Artikkelin sivunumerot: 213-240
Kustantaja: Sam Houston State University
Kustannuspaikka: Huntsville
Julkaisumaa: Yhdysvallat (USA)
Julkaisun kieli: englanti
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5406/28315081.22.1.2.12
Julkaisun avoin saatavuus: Ei avoin
Julkaisukanavan avoin saatavuus:
Julkaisu on rinnakkaistallennettu (JYX): https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/63814
Lisätietoja: Special issue: Engaging the New Mobilities Paradigm in the Context of Finland. Guest edited by Driss Habti and Tuulikki Kurki.
Tiivistelmä
In this policy analysis, we explain the difference between policy-based evidence (PBE) and evidence-based policy (EBP). We argue that better, evidence-based understanding, explanations, and questions can be sought by problematizing the challenging forms of twenty-first century migration and mobilities. We emphasize that this can be done by not confusing PBE with EBP, especially when each is needed as a basis for specific types of action. By focusing on topics often viewed as “unrelated” or confused with one another, we underline the social dynamics that are unfamiliar to many policy actors, professionals, and stakeholders, who rely on scholars for actionable analyses. Our mode of inquiry is based on nexus analysis, and it contrasts and problematizes our recent studies, research in progress related to distinct types of mobilities and migration. The article draws on four disciplines and a more diverse set of perspectives than is the norm in Finland. Because of this, we are able to articulate better the relationship between contemporary migration challenges in Finland and present better policy questions that the mobilities paradigm brings into view.
YSO-asiasanat: korkea-asteen koulutus; liikkuvuus; maahanmuutto; muuttoliike; näyttöön perustuvat käytännöt; neksusanalyysi
Vapaat asiasanat: higher education; migration; mobilities; policy analysis; Europe
Liittyvät organisaatiot
OKM-raportointi: Kyllä
Raportointivuosi: 2019
JUFO-taso: 2
