A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
Effects of undergrowth removal and edge proximity on ground beetles and vascular plants in urban boreal forests (2019)


Koivula, M., Virta, T., Kuitunen, M., & Vallius, E. (2019). Effects of undergrowth removal and edge proximity on ground beetles and vascular plants in urban boreal forests. Journal of Urban Ecology, 5(1), Article juz007. https://doi.org/10.1093/jue/juz007


JYU-tekijät tai -toimittajat


Julkaisun tiedot

Julkaisun kaikki tekijät tai toimittajatKoivula, Matti; Virta, Tiina; Kuitunen, Markku; Vallius, Elisa

Lehti tai sarjaJournal of Urban Ecology

ISSN2058-5543

eISSN2058-5543

Julkaisuvuosi2019

Volyymi5

Lehden numero1

Artikkelinumerojuz007

KustantajaOxford University Press

JulkaisumaaBritannia

Julkaisun kielienglanti

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1093/jue/juz007

Linkki tutkimusaineistoonhttps://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.h15c4sp

Julkaisun avoin saatavuusAvoimesti saatavilla

Julkaisukanavan avoin saatavuusKokonaan avoin julkaisukanava

Julkaisu on rinnakkaistallennettu (JYX)https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/64716


Tiivistelmä

Urban forests are regularly managed for human safety and esthetic reasons, but they are crucial habitat for many species. Removals of undergrowth occur commonly in these forests, yet the ecological consequences of these operations are poorly understood. We sampled ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) and vascular plants along 20-m edge gradients in Finnish urban forests, in five stands treated 0.5–2.5 years earlier with undergrowth removal and in five untreated stands. We hypothesized that undergrowth removal and edge proximity would benefit opportunistic and open-habitat species, whereas shady-habitat species would be affected negatively. (1) Regarding carabids, diversity and evenness indices, open-habitat species and Carabus nemoralis responded positively, and forest species, Leistus terminatus and Pterostichus oblongopunctatus responded negatively, to the undergrowth removal. Regarding plants, generalists, Maianthemum bifolium, Rubus saxatilis and Sorbus aucuparia responded positively, and forest species, Geranium sylvaticum, Oxalis acetocella and Vaccinium myrtillus responded negatively, to the undergrowth removal. (2) Edge proximity had little effect on both plants and carabids. However, open-habitat carabids were less abundant and less speciose, and the plants Oxalis acetocella, Trientalis europaea and Rubus saxatilis had higher cover, 10–20 m from than right at the edge. (3) Plant (but not carabid) community responded to the undergrowth removal but not to the edge proximity. When managing urban forests, we recommend an avoidance of undergrowth removals at sites that host rare or threatened forest-associated flora and fauna.


YSO-asiasanattaajamametsätmetsänkäsittelyaluskasvillisuuseliöyhteisötmaakiitäjäisetputkilokasvit

Vapaat asiasanatabundance; Carabidae; community; edge effect; management; species richness


Liittyvät organisaatiot


OKM-raportointiKyllä

Raportointivuosi2019

JUFO-taso1


Viimeisin päivitys 2024-08-01 klo 16:30