A3 Book section, Chapters in research books
Dead Dog Talking : Posthumous, Preposthumous, and Preposterous Canine Narration in Charles Siebert’s Angus (2020)


Keskinen, M. (2020). Dead Dog Talking : Posthumous, Preposthumous, and Preposterous Canine Narration in Charles Siebert’s Angus. In S. Karkulehto, A.-K. Koistinen, & E. Varis (Eds.), Reconfiguring Human, Nonhuman and Posthuman in Literature and Culture (pp. 145-162). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429243042-11


JYU authors or editors


Publication details

All authors or editorsKeskinen, Mikko

Parent publicationReconfiguring Human, Nonhuman and Posthuman in Literature and Culture

Parent publication editorsKarkulehto, Sanna; Koistinen, Aino-Kaisa; Varis, Essi

ISBN978-0-367-19747-6

eISBN978-0-429-24304-2

Publication year2020

Pages range145-162

Number of pages in the book400

PublisherRoutledge

Place of PublicationNew York

Publication countryUnited States

Publication languageEnglish

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.4324/9780429243042-11

Publication open accessOpenly available

Publication channel open accessOpen Access channel

Publication is parallel published (JYX)https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/72755


Abstract

The section focusing on narrating and narrated animals opens with Mikko Keskinen’s chapter, which probes the narrational peculiarities of posthumous tales told by dogs. The primary target of Keskinen’s analysis is Charles Siebert’s novel Angus (2000), a first-person memoir of a dying Jack Russell terrier. The novel presents its canine protagonist Angus as having an outstanding command of the English language, whereby it is no surprise that his lineage turns out to be particularly literary. Yet there are curious idiosyncrasies in his parlance, which appear to suggest a uniquely cynomorphic language and worldview.

Since Angus the dog resides on the border zone between human and nonhuman spheres of communication and knowledge, he is a hybrid creature: domesticated, yet wildly unfamiliar. A similar hybridity marks Angus the novel and the effects of its narration: backward narration may appear a “natural” analogy to canines’ ability to trail lingering scents, but it also results in unnatural and counterfactual effects and storylines.


Keywordsexperimental literaturenarrationtime structuredogposthumanism


Contributing organizations


Ministry reportingYes

Reporting Year2020

JUFO rating3


Last updated on 2024-22-04 at 10:51