A1 Journal article (refereed)
Community size can affect the signals of ecological drift and niche selection on biodiversity (2020)

Siqueira, T., Saito, V. S., Bini, L. M., Melo, A. S., Petsch, D. K., Landeiro, V. L., Tolonen, K. T., Jyrkänkallio-Mikkola, J., Soininen, J., & Heino, J. (2020). Community size can affect the signals of ecological drift and niche selection on biodiversity. Ecology, 101(6), Article e03014. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3014

JYU authors or editors

Publication details

All authors or editors: Siqueira, Tadeu; Saito, Victor S.; Bini, Luis M.; Melo, Adriano S.; Petsch, Danielle K.; Landeiro, Victor L.; Tolonen, Kimmo T.; Jyrkänkallio-Mikkola, Jenny; Soininen, Janne; Heino, Jani

Journal or series: Ecology

ISSN: 0012-9658

eISSN: 1939-9170

Publication year: 2020

Volume: 101

Issue number: 6

Article number: e03014

Publisher: John Wiley & Sons

Publication country: United States

Publication language: English

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3014

Publication open access: Not open

Publication channel open access: 

Publication is parallel published (JYX): https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/67956

Abstract

Ecological drift can override the effects of deterministic niche selection on small populations and drive the assembly of some ecological communities. We tested this hypothesis with a unique dataset sampled identically in 200 streams in two regions (tropical Brazil and boreal Finland) that differ in macroinvertebrate community size by five‐fold. Null models allowed us to estimate the magnitude to which beta diversity deviates from the expectation under a random assembly process while taking differences in richness and relative abundance into account, i.e., beta deviation. We found that while incidence‐based β‐diversity was negatively related to community size only in Brazil, abundance‐based β‐diversity was negatively related to community size in both Brazil and Finland. β‐diversity of small tropical communities was closer to stochastic expectations compared with β‐diversity of large communities. We suggest that ecological drift may drive variation in some small communities by changing the expected outcome of niche selection, increasing the chances of species with low abundance and narrow distribution to occur in some communities. Habitat destruction, overexploitation, pollution, and reductions in connectivity have been reducing the size of biological communities. These environmental pressures might make smaller communities more vulnerable to novel conditions and render community dynamics more unpredictable. Incorporation of community size into ecological models should provide conceptual and applied insights into a better understanding of the processes driving biodiversity.

Keywords: aquatic fauna; insects; biodiversity; natural diversity

Free keywords: aquatic insects; beta diversity deviation; community assembly; demographic stochasticity; dispersal metacommunities; null models

Contributing organizations

Ministry reporting: Yes

Reporting Year: 2020

JUFO rating: 3