A1 Journal article (refereed)
Differences in Training Adaptations of Endurance Performance during Combined Strength and Endurance Training in a 6-Month Crisis Management Operation (2020)


Pihlainen, K., Häkkinen, K., Santtila, M., Raitanen, J., & Kyröläinen, H. (2020). Differences in Training Adaptations of Endurance Performance during Combined Strength and Endurance Training in a 6-Month Crisis Management Operation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), Article 1688. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051688


JYU authors or editors


Publication details

All authors or editorsPihlainen, Kai; Häkkinen, Keijo; Santtila, Matti; Raitanen, Jani; Kyröläinen, Heikki

Journal or seriesInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

ISSN1661-7827

eISSN1660-4601

Publication year2020

Volume17

Issue number5

Article number1688

PublisherMDPI

Publication countrySwitzerland

Publication languageEnglish

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051688

Publication open accessOpenly available

Publication channel open accessOpen Access channel

Publication is parallel published (JYX)https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/68209


Abstract

Decreases in aerobic fitness during military operations have been observed in several studies. Thus, differences in training adaptations during a 6-month crisis-management operation were compared by using the change in endurance performance as the outcome measure. Sixty-six male soldiers volunteered for the study, consisting of pre–post assessments of blood biomarkers, body composition, physical performance, and the military simulation test (MST) performance. Physical training volume was self-reported. After the follow-up, the data were divided based on individual changes in endurance performance. Endurance performance was improved in the high-responder group (HiR, n = 25) and maintained or decreased in the low-responder group (LoR n = 24). During the operation, the LoR group decreased while the HiR group increased their endurance training frequency from the pre-deployment level (Δ 28 ± 57% vs. −40 ± 62%, p = 0.004). Fat mass decreased (−7.6 ± 11.7% vs. 14.2 ± 20.4%, p < 0.001), and 1-min push-up (27.7 ± 21.9% vs. 11.7 ± 26.1%, p = 0.004) and MST performance improved (−13.6 ± 6.8% vs. −7.5 ± 6.5%, p = 0.006) more in the HiR group. No differences were observed in the changes of other physical performance test results or analyzed biomarkers. In conclusion, soldiers who were initially leaner and fitter in terms of lower body strength and power were more likely to decrease their aerobic fitness during the operation.


Keywordssoldiersmilitary operationsphysical fitnessbody compositionendurance trainingstrength trainingtraining responseadaptation (change)

Free keywordssoldier; combined training; cardiorespiratory fitness; bioimpedance; training response; adaptation


Contributing organizations


Ministry reportingYes

VIRTA submission year2020

JUFO rating1


Last updated on 2024-12-10 at 06:00