A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
Water immersion methods do not alter muscle damage and inflammation biomarkers after high-intensity sprinting and jumping exercise (2020)


Ahokas, Essi K.; Kyröläinen, Heikki; Mero, Antti; Walker, Simon; Hanstock, Helen G.; Ihalainen, Johanna K. (2020). Water immersion methods do not alter muscle damage and inflammation biomarkers after high-intensity sprinting and jumping exercise. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 120 (10), 2625-2634. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-020-04481-8


JYU-tekijät tai -toimittajat


Julkaisun tiedot

Julkaisun kaikki tekijät tai toimittajat: Ahokas, Essi K.; Kyröläinen, Heikki; Mero, Antti; Walker, Simon; Hanstock, Helen G.; Ihalainen, Johanna K.

Lehti tai sarja: European Journal of Applied Physiology

ISSN: 1439-6319

eISSN: 1439-6327

Julkaisuvuosi: 2020

Volyymi: 120

Lehden numero: 10

Artikkelin sivunumerot: 2625-2634

Kustantaja: Springer

Julkaisumaa: Saksa

Julkaisun kieli: englanti

DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04481-8

Avoin saatavuus: Hybridijulkaisukanavassa ilmestynyt avoin julkaisu

Julkaisu on rinnakkaistallennettu (JYX): https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/71643


Tiivistelmä

Purpose
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of three water immersion interventions performed after active recovery compared to active recovery only on the resolution of inflammation and markers of muscle damage post-exercise.
Methods
Nine physically active men (n = 9; age 20‒35 years) performed an intensive loading protocol, including maximal jumps and sprinting on four occasions. After each trial, one of three recovery interventions (10 min duration) was used in a random order: cold-water immersion (CWI, 10 °C), thermoneutral water immersion (TWI, 24 °C), contrast water therapy (CWT, alternately 10 °C and 38 °C). All of these methods were performed after an active recovery (10 min bicycle ergometer), and were compared to active recovery only (ACT). 5 min, 1, 24, 48, and 96 h after exercise bouts, immune response and recovery were assessed through leukocyte subsets, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, myoglobin and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentrations.
Results
Significant changes in all blood markers occurred at post-loading (p < 0.05), but there were no significant differences observed in the recovery between methods. However, retrospective analysis revealed significant trial-order effects for myoglobin and neutrophils (p < 0.01). Only lymphocytes displayed satisfactory reliability in the exercise response, with intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.5.
Conclusions
The recovery methods did not affect the resolution of inflammatory and immune responses after high-intensity sprinting and jumping exercise. It is notable that the biomarker responses were variable within individuals. Thus, the lack of differences between recovery methods may have been influenced by the reliability of exercise-induced biomarker responses.


YSO-asiasanat: voimaharjoittelu; palautuminen; tulehdus; kylpyhoito; kylmähoito; lämpöhoito

Vapaat asiasanat: cold-water immersion; thermoneutral water immersion; contrast water therapy; recovery; inflammation


Liittyvät organisaatiot


OKM-raportointi: Kyllä

Alustava JUFO-taso: 1


Viimeisin päivitys 2020-20-11 klo 09:19