G5 Doctoral dissertation (article)
First of its kind : Eurajoki as a nuclear community and site for the final disposal of spent nuclear fuel (2020)
Kari, M. (2020). First of its kind : Eurajoki as a nuclear community and site for the final disposal of spent nuclear fuel [Doctoral dissertation]. Jyväskylän yliopisto. JYU dissertations, 255. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-39-8245-4
JYU authors or editors
Publication details
All authors or editors: Kari, Mika
eISBN: 978-951-39-8245-4
Journal or series: JYU dissertations
eISSN: 2489-9003
Publication year: 2020
Number in series: 255
Number of pages in the book: 1 verkkoaineisto (114 sivua, 179 sivua useina numerointijaksoina, 21 numeroimatonta sivua)
Publisher: Jyväskylän yliopisto
Place of Publication: Jyväskylä
Publication country: Finland
Publication language: English
Persistent website address: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-39-8245-4
Publication open access: Openly available
Publication channel open access: Open Access channel
Abstract
The dissertation examines Eurajoki as a nuclear community pioneering in nuclear waste management. Eurajoki in Finland is the first municipality in the world where the siting of a final disposal facility for spent nuclear fuel (SNF) was concluded with the appropriate public and community acceptance. The subsequent granting of the construction licence has been characterized as "a milestone of global importance". The interest in Eurajoki, stems from it being 'the first of its kind'. That said, Eurajoki is also a prime example of the tendency of nuclear communities to be more amenable to final disposal. While identifying a successful method for securing willing host communities has been a long-term mission of the international nuclear waste management community, understanding the dynamics of public and local acceptance also pose a challenge from the viewpoint of governance and social sciences. The aim of the study is three-fold: 1) To form a picture of Eurajoki as a nuclear community and to examine the rationality of community acceptance in light of a resident survey. This is done by briefly recounting how Eurajoki became a nuclear community and the site for final disposal and exploring residents' opinions and their relation to certain theories. 2) To scrutinise the workings of the competing nuclear oasis and industry awareness frames by analysing how nuclear communities are interpreted and by applying the competing viewpoints to the results of the survey. 3) To draw conclusions on the viability of the frames based on the findings and reflect on the way forward given the evidence gathered in the course of the study. The frames examined differ widely from each other. Where the nuclear oasis frame leans heavily on patterns of power related to economic and employment considerations, the industry awareness frame focuses heavily on the socio-cultural and symbolic dimensions of siting. The results indicate that both concentrating strictly on economic necessities and dependency or, on other hand, on cultural integration and cultural capacity is clearly insufficient and that inhabitants' acceptance culminates in more encompassing considerations related to community well-being. Both the relationship between implementer and community and the perceived contribution of the project to the well-being of the community are highlighted.
Keywords: nuclear waste; final deposition; societal responsibility; regional development; industrial areas; residents; attitudes; public opinion; local bargaining; well-being; environmental sociology
Free keywords: nuclear waste; spent nuclear fuel; final disposal; nuclear community; framing; nuclear oasis; industry awareness; community well-being; siting; acceptance; opinions; survey; repository; Finland; Eurajoki
Contributing organizations
Ministry reporting: Yes
Reporting Year: 2020