A1 Journal article (refereed)
Oikeudenmukaisuus elollisia olentoja kohtaan : Porfyrioksen pidättäytymisen etiikka (2020)
Tuominen, M. (2020). Oikeudenmukaisuus elollisia olentoja kohtaan : Porfyrioksen pidättäytymisen etiikka. Teologinen aikakauskirja, 125(4), 291-309.
JYU authors or editors
Publication details
All authors or editors: Tuominen, Miira
Journal or series: Teologinen aikakauskirja
ISSN: 0040-3555
Publication year: 2020
Volume: 125
Issue number: 4
Pages range: 291-309
Publisher: Teologinen julkaisuseura
Publication country: Finland
Publication language: Finnish
Publication open access: Not open
Publication channel open access:
Publication is parallel published (JYX): https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/77940
Abstract
In this article, I argue that Porphyry’s conception of justice in On abstinence is remarkable for several reasons. While I agree with Fay Edwards that Porphyry does not assume the moral status of animals to depend on their rationality, I argue that Porphyry’s claim is not based on any form of the assumption that animals deserve moral consideration only if they share some relevant property with human beings. Contrary to Edwards, I argue that this is not because justice is irrelevant to animals in On abstinence 3. Rather, extending abstinence from causing harm to humans to apply also to non-human animals and plants is a constitutive element in the higher forms of justice that Porphyry requires of philosophers.
Keywords: human-animal relationship; relation to nature; justice; animals; plants; value (properties); consciousness (mental properties); humanity (societal properties); animal rights; morals; ethics; ancient philosophy
Free keywords: Porphyry; De abstinentia
Contributing organizations
Ministry reporting: Yes
Reporting Year: 2020
JUFO rating: 2