A3 Kirjan tai muun kokoomateoksen osa
On Common Sense, Estimation, and the Soul’s Unity in Avicenna (2020)


Kaukua, J. (2020). On Common Sense, Estimation, and the Soul’s Unity in Avicenna. In D. Bennett, & J. Toivanen (Eds.), Philosophical Problems in Sense Perception : Testing the Limits of Aristotelianism (pp. 151-160). Springer. Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind, 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56946-4_8


JYU-tekijät tai -toimittajat


Julkaisun tiedot

Julkaisun kaikki tekijät tai toimittajatKaukua, Jari

EmojulkaisuPhilosophical Problems in Sense Perception : Testing the Limits of Aristotelianism

Emojulkaisun toimittajatBennett, David; Toivanen, Juhana

ISBN978-3-030-56945-7

eISBN978-3-030-56946-4

Lehti tai sarjaStudies in the History of Philosophy of Mind

ISSN1573-5834

eISSN2542-9922

Julkaisuvuosi2020

Sarjan numero26

Artikkelin sivunumerot151-160

Kirjan kokonaissivumäärä258

KustantajaSpringer

KustannuspaikkaCham

JulkaisumaaSveitsi

Julkaisun kielienglanti

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56946-4_8

Julkaisun avoin saatavuusEi avoin

Julkaisukanavan avoin saatavuus

Julkaisu on rinnakkaistallennettu (JYX)https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/74604


Tiivistelmä

This paper addresses two questions related to Themistius’ alleged influence on Avicenna’s theory of the common sense. The first question concerns the phenomenon of incidental perception, which Themistius explained by means of the common sense. For Avicenna, on the contrary, the explanation of cases like our perceiving something yellow as honey involves the faculty of estimation and the entire system of the internal senses that he coined, and this results in an analysis that is considerably more complex than Themistius’. The second question concerns Themistius’ claim according to which an incorporeal spirit is the primary subject of perception. I argue that Avicenna departs from such a view both because for him spirit is a corporeal substance and because he insists that the subject of all cognition is the soul, not any of its faculties. Finally, I conclude by briefly considering other, more general ways in which Themistius could have influenced Avicenna’s psychology.


YSO-asiasanatmielenfilosofiahavainnotaistitterve järkisieluarabialainen filosofia

Vapaat asiasanatAvicenna; Themistius


Liittyvät organisaatiot


OKM-raportointiKyllä

VIRTA-lähetysvuosi2020

JUFO-taso2


Viimeisin päivitys 2024-12-10 klo 08:00