A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
Impact or No Impact for Women With Mild Knee Osteoarthritis : A Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Two Randomized Controlled Trials With Contrasting Interventions (2022)
Heikkinen, R., Waller, B., Munukka, M., Multanen, J., Heinonen, A., & Karvanen, J. (2022). Impact or No Impact for Women With Mild Knee Osteoarthritis : A Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Two Randomized Controlled Trials With Contrasting Interventions. Arthritis Care and Research, 74(7), 1133-1141. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.24553
JYU-tekijät tai -toimittajat
Julkaisun tiedot
Julkaisun kaikki tekijät tai toimittajat: Heikkinen, Risto; Waller, Benjamin; Munukka, Matti; Multanen, Juhani; Heinonen, Ari; Karvanen, Juha
Lehti tai sarja: Arthritis Care and Research
ISSN: 2151-464X
eISSN: 2151-4658
Julkaisuvuosi: 2022
Ilmestymispäivä: 09.01.2021
Volyymi: 74
Lehden numero: 7
Artikkelin sivunumerot: 1133-1141
Kustantaja: John Wiley & Sons
Julkaisumaa: Yhdysvallat (USA)
Julkaisun kieli: englanti
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.24553
Julkaisun avoin saatavuus: Avoimesti saatavilla
Julkaisukanavan avoin saatavuus: Osittain avoin julkaisukanava
Julkaisu on rinnakkaistallennettu (JYX): https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/82162
Tiivistelmä
Methods: Original data sets from two previously conducted randomised controlled trials (RCT) were combined and used in a Bayesian meta-analysis. Group differences in multiple response variables were estimated. Variables included cardiorespiratory fitness, dynamic maximum leg muscle power, maximal isometric knee extension and flexion force, pain, other symptoms and quality of life. The statistical model included a latent commitment variable for each female participant.
Results: ART has 55% - 71% probability of benefits in the outcome variables and as the main effect, the intervention outperforms the control in cardiorespiratory fitness with a probability of 71% immediately after the intervention period. HLT has 46% - 63% probability of benefits after intervention with the outcome variables, but differently from ART, the positive effects of physical performance fade away during the follow-up period. Overall, the differences between groups were small and the variation in the predictions between individuals was high.
Conclusions: Both interventions had benefits but ART has a slightly higher probability of long-term benefits on physical performance. Because of high individual variation and no clear advantage of one training method over the other, personal preferences should be considered in the selection of the exercise program to ensure highest commitment to training.
YSO-asiasanat: nivelrikko; lääkinnällinen kuntoutus; liikuntahoito
Liittyvät organisaatiot
Hankkeet, joissa julkaisu on tehty
- Yliopistojen profiloitumisen vahvistaminen kilpaillulla rahoituksella. Profilointitoimet JYU:ssä, 3. kierros
- Hämäläinen, Keijo
- Suomen Akatemia
OKM-raportointi: Kyllä
Raportointivuosi: 2022
JUFO-taso: 1