A4 Artikkeli konferenssijulkaisussa
Time for AI (Ethics) maturity model is now (2021)


Vakkuri, Ville; Jantunen, Marianna; Halme, Erika; Kemell, Kai-Kristian; Nguyen-Duc, Anh; Mikkonen, Tommi; Abrahamsson, Pekka (2021). Time for AI (Ethics) maturity model is now. In Espinoza, Huáscar; McDermid, John; Huang, Xiaowei; Castillo-Effen, Mauricio; Chen, Xin Cynthia; Hernandez-Orallo, José; OhEigeartaigh, Seán; Mallah, Richard (Eds.) SafeAI 2021 : Proceedings of the 2021 Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Safety (CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2808. RWTH Aachen. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2808/Paper_16.pdf


JYU-tekijät tai -toimittajat


Julkaisun tiedot

Julkaisun kaikki tekijät tai toimittajat: Vakkuri, Ville; Jantunen, Marianna; Halme, Erika; Kemell, Kai-Kristian; Nguyen-Duc, Anh; Mikkonen, Tommi; Abrahamsson, Pekka

Emojulkaisu: SafeAI 2021 : Proceedings of the 2021 Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Safety

Emojulkaisun toimittajat: Espinoza, Huáscar; McDermid, John; Huang, Xiaowei; Castillo-Effen, Mauricio; Chen, Xin Cynthia; Hernandez-Orallo, José; OhEigeartaigh, Seán; Mallah, Richard

Konferenssi:

  • Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Safety

Konferenssin paikka ja aika: Virtual Conference, 8.2.2021

Lehti tai sarja: CEUR Workshop Proceedings

eISSN: 1613-0073

Julkaisuvuosi: 2021

Sarjan numero: 2808

Kustantaja: RWTH Aachen

Julkaisumaa: Saksa

Julkaisun kieli: englanti

Pysyvä verkko-osoite: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2808/Paper_16.pdf

Avoin saatavuus: Open access -julkaisukanavassa ilmestynyt julkaisu

Julkaisukanavan avoin saatavuus: Kokonaan avoin julkaisukanava

Julkaisun avoin saatavuus: Avoimesti saatavilla

Julkaisu on rinnakkaistallennettu (JYX): https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/74629

Julkaisu on rinnakkaistallennettu: https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.12701


Tiivistelmä

There appears to be a common agreement that ethical concerns are of high importance when it comes to systems equipped with some sort of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Demands for ethical AI are declared from all directions. As a response, in recent years, public bodies, governments, and universities have rushed in to provide a set of principles to be considered when AI based systems are designed and used. We have learned, however, that high-level principles do not turn easily into actionable advice for practitioners. Hence, also companies are publishing their own ethical guidelines to guide their AI development. This paper argues that AI software is still software and needs to be approached from the software development perspective. The software engineering paradigm has introduced maturity model thinking, which provides a roadmap for companies to improve their performance from the selected viewpoints known as the key capabilities. We want to voice out a call for action for the development of a maturity model for AI software. We wish to discuss whether the focus should be on AI ethics or, more broadly, the quality of an AI system, called a maturity model for the development of AI systems.


YSO-asiasanat: tekoäly; järjestelmäsuunnittelu; ohjelmistokehitys; etiikka; eettisyys; toimintaohjeet


Liittyvät organisaatiot


OKM-raportointi: Kyllä

Alustava JUFO-taso: 1


Viimeisin päivitys 2021-30-04 klo 15:59