A4 Article in conference proceedings
Time for AI (Ethics) maturity model is now (2021)


Vakkuri, V., Jantunen, M., Halme, E., Kemell, K.-K., Nguyen-Duc, A., Mikkonen, T., & Abrahamsson, P. (2021). Time for AI (Ethics) maturity model is now. In H. Espinoza, J. McDermid, X. Huang, M. Castillo-Effen, X. C. Chen, J. Hernandez-Orallo, S. OhEigeartaigh, & R. Mallah (Eds.), SafeAI 2021 : Proceedings of the 2021 Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Safety. RWTH Aachen. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2808. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2808/Paper_16.pdf


JYU authors or editors


Publication details

All authors or editorsVakkuri, Ville; Jantunen, Marianna; Halme, Erika; Kemell, Kai-Kristian; Nguyen-Duc, Anh; Mikkonen, Tommi; Abrahamsson, Pekka

Parent publicationSafeAI 2021 : Proceedings of the 2021 Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Safety

Parent publication editorsEspinoza, Huáscar; McDermid, John; Huang, Xiaowei; Castillo-Effen, Mauricio; Chen, Xin Cynthia; Hernandez-Orallo, José; OhEigeartaigh, Seán; Mallah, Richard

Conference:

  • Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Safety

Place and date of conferenceVirtual Conference8.2.2021

Journal or seriesCEUR Workshop Proceedings

eISSN1613-0073

Publication year2021

Number in series2808

PublisherRWTH Aachen

Publication countryGermany

Publication languageEnglish

Persistent website addresshttp://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2808/Paper_16.pdf

Publication open accessOpenly available

Publication channel open accessOpen Access channel

Publication is parallel published (JYX)https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/74629

Publication is parallel publishedhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2101.12701


Abstract

There appears to be a common agreement that ethical concerns are of high importance when it comes to systems equipped with some sort of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Demands for ethical AI are declared from all directions. As a response, in recent years, public bodies, governments, and universities have rushed in to provide a set of principles to be considered when AI based systems are designed and used. We have learned, however, that high-level principles do not turn easily into actionable advice for practitioners. Hence, also companies are publishing their own ethical guidelines to guide their AI development. This paper argues that AI software is still software and needs to be approached from the software development perspective. The software engineering paradigm has introduced maturity model thinking, which provides a roadmap for companies to improve their performance from the selected viewpoints known as the key capabilities. We want to voice out a call for action for the development of a maturity model for AI software. We wish to discuss whether the focus should be on AI ethics or, more broadly, the quality of an AI system, called a maturity model for the development of AI systems.


Keywordsartificial intelligencesystem designsoftware developmentethicsethicalityguidelines


Contributing organizations


Ministry reportingYes

Reporting Year2021

JUFO rating1


Last updated on 2024-22-04 at 20:03