A2 Review article, Literature review, Systematic review
In Defense of Cities : On Negative Presentation of Urban Areas in Environmental Preference Studies (2019)
Besson, A. (2019). In Defense of Cities : On Negative Presentation of Urban Areas in Environmental Preference Studies. Contemporary Aesthetics, 17, Article 861. https://contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/article.php?articleID=861
JYU authors or editors
Publication details
All authors or editors: Besson, Anu
Journal or series: Contemporary Aesthetics
eISSN: 1932-8478
Publication year: 2019
Volume: 17
Article number: 861
Publisher: Contemporary Aesthetics
Publication country: United States
Publication language: English
Persistent website address: https://contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/article.php?articleID=861
Publication open access: Openly available
Publication channel open access: Open Access channel
Publication is parallel published (JYX): https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/75122
Abstract
This paper critiques a common research method, image-based studies, in assessing environmental preferences. The method is used, in particular, in the fields of environmental psychology, landscape studies, and health studies, here called empirical environmental preference studies or EEP studies. I argue that the established view in the EEP field that nature is inherently experienced as more aesthetically appealing and restorative than urban environments may be biased because of the image-based method. This paper presents a literature review of EEP studies, discussing them in a framework of environmental and everyday aesthetics. The conclusion is that EEP studies may strip cities of their physical, socio-cultural, and aesthetic layers; and comparing nature and cities as places of restoration may be unfruitful as our relationship with nature and urban environments is dissimilar.
Keywords: aesthetics; environmental aesthetics; urban environment; urban landscape; multisensory experience; preferences; research methods
Free keywords: aesthetics of ambience; aesthetics of engagement; environmental aesthetics; environmental preference studies; multi-sensory experience; urban environments
Contributing organizations
Ministry reporting: Yes
Preliminary JUFO rating: 2