A2 Review article, Literature review, Systematic review
A Review of Occlusion as a Tool to Assess Attentional Demand in Driving (2023)


Kujala, T., Kircher, K., & Ahlström, C. (2023). A Review of Occlusion as a Tool to Assess Attentional Demand in Driving. Human Factors, 65(5), 792-808. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208211010953


JYU authors or editors


Publication details

All authors or editorsKujala, Tuomo; Kircher, Katja; Ahlström, Christer

Journal or seriesHuman Factors

ISSN0018-7208

eISSN1547-8181

Publication year2023

Publication date28/04/2021

Volume65

Issue number5

Pages range792-808

PublisherSAGE Publications

Publication countryUnited States

Publication languageEnglish

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1177/00187208211010953

Publication open accessOpenly available

Publication channel open accessPartially open access channel

Publication is parallel published (JYX)https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/75409


Abstract

Objective: The aim of this review is to identify how visual occlusion contributes to our understanding of attentional demand and spare visual capacity in driving and the strengths and limitations of the method.
Background: The occlusion technique was developed by John W. Senders to evaluate the attentional demand of driving. Despite its utility, it has been used in-frequently in driver attention/inattention research.
Method: Visual occlusion studies in driving published between 1967 and 2020 were reviewed. The focus was on original studies in which the forward visual field was intermittently occluded while the participant was driving.
Results: Occlusion studies have shown that attentional demand varies across situations and drivers and have indicated environmental, situational, and inter- individual factors behind the variability. The occlusion technique complements eye tracking in being able to indicate the temporal requirements for and redundancy in visual information sampling. The proper selection of occlusion settings depends on the target of the research.
Conclusion: Although there are a number of occlusion studies looking at various aspects of attentional demand, we are still only beginning to understand how these demands vary, interact, and covary in naturalistic driving.
Application: The findings of this review have methodological and theoretical implications for human factors research and for the development of distraction monitoring and in- vehicle system testing. Distraction detection algorithms and testing guidelines should consider the variability in drivers’ situational and individual spare visual capacity.


Keywordsmotor vehicle driversobservationattentionfield of vision

Free keywordsminimum required attention; visual demand; peripheral vision; self-paced; system-paced


Contributing organizations


Ministry reportingYes

Reporting Year2022

JUFO rating2


Last updated on 2024-03-04 at 20:16