A1 Journal article (refereed)
Realistic genetic architecture enables organismal adaptation as predicted under the folk definition of inclusive fitness (2021)


Garcia‐Costoya, G., & Fromhage, L. (2021). Realistic genetic architecture enables organismal adaptation as predicted under the folk definition of inclusive fitness. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 34(7), 1087-1094. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13795


JYU authors or editors


Publication details

All authors or editorsGarcia‐Costoya, Guillermo; Fromhage, Lutz

Journal or seriesJournal of Evolutionary Biology

ISSN1010-061X

eISSN1420-9101

Publication year2021

Publication date02/05/2021

Volume34

Issue number7

Pages range1087-1094

PublisherWiley-Blackwell

Publication countryUnited Kingdom

Publication languageEnglish

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13795

Research data linkhttps://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.1jwstqjv7

Publication open accessOpenly available

Publication channel open accessPartially open access channel

Publication is parallel published (JYX)https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/77105

Additional informationThe used MATLAB code can be found in Dryad.


Abstract

A fundamental task of evolutionary biology is to explain the pervasive impression of organismal design in nature, including traits benefiting kin. Inclusive fitness is considered by many to be a crucial piece in this puzzle, despite ongoing discussion about its scope and limitations. Here we use individual‐based simulations to study what quantity (if any) individual organisms become adapted to maximise when genetic architectures are more or less suitable for the presumed main driver of biological adaptation: namely, cumulative multi‐locus evolution. As an expository device we focus on a hypothetical situation called Charlesworth’s paradox, in which altruism is seemingly predicted to evolve, yet altruists immediately perish along with their altruistic genes. Our results support a recently proposed re‐definition of inclusive fitness, which is concerned with the adaptive design of whole organisms as shaped by multi‐locus evolution, rather than with selection for any focal gene. They also illustrate how our conceptual understanding of adaptation at the phenotypic level should inform our choice of genetic assumptions in abstract simplified models.


Keywordsevolutionary biologyevolutionnatural selectionkin selectionadaptation (change)genes

Free keywordsevolutionary biology


Contributing organizations


Ministry reportingYes

Reporting Year2021

JUFO rating2


Last updated on 2024-03-04 at 20:16