A1 Journal article (refereed)
Liikuntakasvatuksen eetos (2012)
The Ethos of Physical Education
Heikkinen, H. L., Huttunen, R., & Pesonen, J. (2012). Liikuntakasvatuksen eetos. Liikunta & Tiede, 49(6), 18-22. file://fileservices.ad.jyu.fi/homes/rsalmine/Downloads/lt612_tutkimusartikkelit_heikkinen_lowres.pdf
JYU authors or editors
Publication details
All authors or editors: Heikkinen, Hannu L.T.; Huttunen, Rauno; Pesonen, Jyri
Journal or series: Liikunta & Tiede
ISSN: 0358-7010
Publication year: 2012
Volume: 49
Issue number: 6
Pages range: 18-22
Publisher: Liikuntatieteellinen seura
Publication country: Finland
Publication language: Finnish
Persistent website address: file://fileservices.ad.jyu.fi/homes/rsalmine/Downloads/lt612_tutkimusartikkelit_heikkinen_lowres.pdf
Publication open access: Openly available
Publication channel open access: Partially open access channel
Publication is parallel published (JYX): https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/85898
Abstract
The article focuses on the ethos of physical education as a foundation of PE in schools and the education of PE teachers. The concept of the ‘ethos of physical education’ refers to a set of practices, social structures, habits, routines, beliefs and values that guide us in physical education. The fundamental aim of this article is to study the question of to what extent the ethos of physical education derives from the ethos of sport. In the article, the beliefs of PE teachers about the practices of PE are mirrored against a given philosophical view. Our empirical data consists of a public debate that took place in autumn 2011 in the weekly magazine ‘Opettaja’ of the Trade Union of Education in Finland. At the philosophical level, we introduce the concept of the ethos of physical education and its etymological origins. Our starting point is the question of how to promote good life through physical education. In the empirical analysis of the data we apply the classification developed by Hämäläinen (2008), which identifies five dimensions of the sport ethos: work, success, virtuosity, fun and care; all of which can be distinguished in the public debate in Opettaja’. The authors of the present article question whether the physical education debate should be extended beyond the experts in the field. In the authors’ view, bringing the debate closer to the public sphere serves to enrich physical education practices. The ultimate goal is to build the ethos of physical education upon a ‘positive circle of recognition’ in which different capitals of expertise are acknowledged by other participants in the discussion.
Keywords: physical education (upbringing); sports; ethos; physical education teachers; teacher training; philosophy of physical activity
Contributing organizations
Ministry reporting: Yes
VIRTA submission year: 2012
JUFO rating: 1