A1 Journal article (refereed)
Liikuntakasvatuksen eetos (2012)
The Ethos of Physical Education


Heikkinen, H. L., Huttunen, R., & Pesonen, J. (2012). Liikuntakasvatuksen eetos. Liikunta & Tiede, 49(6), 18-22. file://fileservices.ad.jyu.fi/homes/rsalmine/Downloads/lt612_tutkimusartikkelit_heikkinen_lowres.pdf


JYU authors or editors


Publication details

All authors or editorsHeikkinen, Hannu L.T.; Huttunen, Rauno; Pesonen, Jyri

Journal or seriesLiikunta & Tiede

ISSN0358-7010

Publication year2012

Volume49

Issue number6

Pages range18-22

PublisherLiikuntatieteellinen seura

Publication countryFinland

Publication languageFinnish

Persistent website addressfile://fileservices.ad.jyu.fi/homes/rsalmine/Downloads/lt612_tutkimusartikkelit_heikkinen_lowres.pdf

Publication open accessOpenly available

Publication channel open accessPartially open access channel

Publication is parallel published (JYX)https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/85898


Abstract

The article focuses on the ethos of physical education as a foundation of PE in schools and the education of PE teachers. The concept of the ‘ethos of physical education’ refers to a set of practices, social structures, habits, routines, beliefs and values that guide us in physical education. The fundamental aim of this article is to study the question of to what extent the ethos of physical education derives from the ethos of sport. In the article, the beliefs of PE teachers about the practices of PE are mirrored against a given philosophical view. Our empirical data consists of a public debate that took place in autumn 2011 in the weekly magazine ‘Opettaja’ of the Trade Union of Education in Finland. At the philosophical level, we introduce the concept of the ethos of physical education and its etymological origins. Our starting point is the question of how to promote good life through physical education. In the empirical analysis of the data we apply the classification developed by Hämäläinen (2008), which identifies five dimensions of the sport ethos: work, success, virtuosity, fun and care; all of which can be distinguished in the public debate in Opettaja’. The authors of the present article question whether the physical education debate should be extended beyond the experts in the field. In the authors’ view, bringing the debate closer to the public sphere serves to enrich physical education practices. The ultimate goal is to build the ethos of physical education upon a ‘positive circle of recognition’ in which different capitals of expertise are acknowledged by other participants in the discussion.


Keywordsphysical education (upbringing)sportsethosphysical education teachersteacher trainingphilosophy of physical activity


Contributing organizations


Ministry reportingYes

VIRTA submission year2012

JUFO rating1


Last updated on 2024-08-05 at 22:05