A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
Midlife work ability and mobility limitation in old age among non-disability and disability retirees : a prospective study (2016)
von Bonsdorff, M., Rantanen, T., Törmäkangas, T., Kulmala, J., Hinrichs, T., Seitsamo, J., Nygård, C.-H., ilmarinen, J., & von Bonsdorff, M. (2016). Midlife work ability and mobility limitation in old age among non-disability and disability retirees : a prospective study. BMC Public Health, 16, Article 154. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2846-y
JYU-tekijät tai -toimittajat
Julkaisun tiedot
Julkaisun kaikki tekijät tai toimittajat: von Bonsdorff, Monika; Rantanen, Taina; Törmäkangas, Timo; Kulmala, Jenni; Hinrichs, Timo; Seitsamo, Jorma; Nygård, Clas-Håkan; ilmarinen, Juhani; von Bonsdorff, Mikaela
Lehti tai sarja: BMC Public Health
ISSN: 1471-2458
eISSN: 1471-2458
Julkaisuvuosi: 2016
Volyymi: 16
Lehden numero: 0
Artikkelinumero: 154
Kustantaja: BioMed Central Ltd.
Kustannuspaikka: Lontoo
Julkaisumaa: Britannia
Julkaisun kieli: englanti
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2846-y
Julkaisun avoin saatavuus: Avoimesti saatavilla
Julkaisukanavan avoin saatavuus: Kokonaan avoin julkaisukanava
Julkaisu on rinnakkaistallennettu (JYX): https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/48857
Julkaisu on rinnakkaistallennettu: https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129658/Kulmala%20Midlife%20work%20ability.pdf
Tiivistelmä
Methods: 4329 participants of the Finnish Longitudinal Study of Municipal Employees (FLAME) had retired during January 1985 and July 2000. They had data on retirement, perceived work ability in 1985, and self-reported mobility limitation (non-disability retirement n = 2870, men 39 %; and diagnose-specific disability retirement n = 1459, men 48 %). Self-reported mobility was measured in 1985, 1992, 1997 and 2009. The latest score available was used to assess the number of mobility limitation. Work ability was measured by asking the respondents to evaluate their current work ability against their lifetime best in 1985. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for work ability predicting mobility limitation in non-disability and diagnose-specific disability retirement groups were calculated using Poisson regression models.
Results: The prevalence of mobility limitation for those who transitioned into non-disability retirement (Incidence Rate, IR = 0.45, 95 % CI = 0.44–0.46) was lower compared to those who retired due to disability (IR = 0.65, CI = 0.63–0.66). A onepoint increase in the work ability score decreased the risk for having one more mobility limitation among non-disability and all diagnose-specific retirement groups (musculoskeletal disease, cardiovascular disease, mental disorder, and other diseases).
Conclusions: Better midlife work ability may protect from old age mobility limitation among those who retire due to non-disability and disability. Promoting work ability in midlife may lead to more independent, active aging, regardless of type of retirement.
YSO-asiasanat: kunnan työntekijät; eläkeläiset; työkyky; liikuntarajoitteet; seurantatutkimus
Vapaat asiasanat: disability retirement; mobility limitation; aging
Liittyvät organisaatiot
Hankkeet, joissa julkaisu on tehty
- Polku- ja rakenneyhtälömalleja suuriulotteisten bioinformaatioaineistojen analysointiin iäkkäiden ihmisten tutkimuksessa
- Törmäkangas, Timo
- Suomen Akatemia
OKM-raportointi: Kyllä
VIRTA-lähetysvuosi: 2016
JUFO-taso: 1