A1 Journal article (refereed)
Rasch Analysis of the Japanese Version of Teacher Efficacy for Inclusive Practices Scale : Scale Unidimensionality (2020)
Alnahdi, G. H., & Yada, A. (2020). Rasch Analysis of the Japanese Version of Teacher Efficacy for Inclusive Practices Scale : Scale Unidimensionality. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 1725. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01725
JYU authors or editors
Publication details
All authors or editors: Alnahdi, Ghaleb H.; Yada, Akie
Journal or series: Frontiers in Psychology
eISSN: 1664-1078
Publication year: 2020
Publication date: 29/07/2020
Volume: 11
Article number: 1725
Publisher: Frontiers Media SA
Publication country: Switzerland
Publication language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01725
Publication open access: Openly available
Publication channel open access: Open Access channel
Publication is parallel published (JYX): https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/71644
Abstract
This study aimed to examine the construct validity of the Japanese version of the Teacher Efficacy for Inclusive Practices (TEIP) scale. The sample consisted of 250 teachers in Japan. Rasch analysis was used to examine the psychometric properties of the scale. Results did not support the 18-item Japanese version of the TEIP scale as a unidimensional scale for measuring TEIP. However, they do support the final 14-item Japanese version of the TEIP scale as a unidimensional scale for measuring TEIP. Four items were removed from the original 18-item scale (items 12, 8, 5, and 3) for violation of the local independency assumption. No item with differential item functioning (DIF) was detected. Only one item (item 18) was rescored to solve a threshold disorder. Further studies with different samples are warranted to confirm the study findings.
Keywords: special education (upbringing); inclusion; educational methods; practice; teachers; independent initiative; Rasch model
Free keywords: inclusive education; Japan; Rasch analysis; TEIP
Contributing organizations
Ministry reporting: Yes
Reporting Year: 2020
JUFO rating: 1