A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
Feasibility and reproducibility of electroencephalography-based corticokinematic coherence (2020)


Piitulainen, H., Illman, M. J., Jousmäki, V., & Bourguignon, M. (2020). Feasibility and reproducibility of electroencephalography-based corticokinematic coherence. Journal of Neurophysiology, 124(6), 1959-1967. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00562.2020


JYU-tekijät tai -toimittajat


Julkaisun tiedot

Julkaisun kaikki tekijät tai toimittajatPiitulainen, Harri; Illman, Mia Johanna; Jousmäki, Veikko; Bourguignon, Mathieu

Lehti tai sarjaJournal of Neurophysiology

ISSN0022-3077

eISSN1522-1598

Julkaisuvuosi2020

Ilmestymispäivä28.10.2020

Volyymi124

Lehden numero6

Artikkelin sivunumerot1959-1967

KustantajaAmerican Physiological Society

JulkaisumaaYhdysvallat (USA)

Julkaisun kielienglanti

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00562.2020

Julkaisun avoin saatavuusEi avoin

Julkaisukanavan avoin saatavuus

Julkaisu on rinnakkaistallennettu (JYX)https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/72444


Tiivistelmä

Corticokinematic coherence (CKC) is the phase coupling between limb kinematics and cortical neurophysiological signals reflecting cortical processing of proprioceptive afference, and is reproducible when estimated with magnetoencephalography (MEG). However, feasibility and reproducibility of CKC based on electroencephalography (EEG) is still unclear and is the primary object of the present report. Thirteen healthy right-handed volunteers (7 females, 21.7 ± 4.3 years) participated two separate EEG sessions 12.6±1.3 months apart. Participants' dominant and non-dominant index finger was continuously moved at 3 Hz for 4 min separately using a pneumatic-movement actuator. Coherence was computed between finger acceleration and three derivations of EEG signals: (1) average reference, (2) bipolar derivations, and (3) surface Laplacian. CKC strength was defined as the peak coherence value at the movement frequency. Intraclass-correlation coefficient values (0.74-0.93) indicated excellent inter-session reproducibility for CKC strength for all derivations and moved fingers. CKC strength obtained with EEG was ~2 times lower compared to MEG but the values were positively correlated across the participants. CKC strength was significantly (p<0.01) higher for bipolar (session-1 0.19±0.09; session-2 0.20±0.10) and surface Laplacian (session-1 0.22±0.09; session-2 0.21±0.09) derivations than for the average reference (session 1 0.10±0.04; session 2, 0.11±0.05). We demonstrated that CKC is feasible and reproducible tool to monitor proprioception using EEG recordings, although the strength of CKC was twice lower for EEG compared to MEG. Laplacian and bipolar (CP3-C1/CP3-C3 and CP4-C2/C4-FC2) EEG derivation(s) are recommended for future research and clinical use of CKC method.


YSO-asiasanatneurotieteetbiomekaniikkaliikeaistiEEGtoistettavuus

Vapaat asiasanatproprioception; repeatability; kinematics; electroencephalography; somatosensory


Liittyvät organisaatiot


Hankkeet, joissa julkaisu on tehty


OKM-raportointiKyllä

Raportointivuosi2020

JUFO-taso2


Viimeisin päivitys 2024-22-04 klo 12:17