A1 Journal article (refereed)
Analyzing science teachers’ support of dialogic argumentation using teacher roles of questioning and communicative approaches (2023)


Kilpelä, J., Hiltunen, J., Hähkiöniemi, M., Jokiranta, K., Lehesvuori, S., Nieminen, P., & Viiri, J. (2023). Analyzing science teachers’ support of dialogic argumentation using teacher roles of questioning and communicative approaches. Dialogic Pedagogy, 11(3), A88-A118. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2023.547


JYU authors or editors


Publication details

All authors or editorsKilpelä, Jonathan; Hiltunen, Jenna; Hähkiöniemi, Markus; Jokiranta, Kaisa; Lehesvuori, Sami; Nieminen, Pasi; Viiri, Jouni

Journal or seriesDialogic Pedagogy

eISSN2325-3290

Publication year2023

Publication date02/05/2023

Volume11

Issue number3

Pages rangeA88-A118

PublisherUniversity Library System, University of Pittsburgh

Publication countryUnited States

Publication languageEnglish

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2023.547

Publication open accessOpenly available

Publication channel open accessOpen Access channel

Publication is parallel published (JYX)https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/86966


Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate how teachers use different types of discourse to support dialogic argumentation. Dialogic argumentation is a collaborative process in which students construct arguments together and examine arguments presented by their peers. Science teachers can use argumentation as a vehicle to help students gain a working understanding of science content and the nature of science and its practices. Whole-class closing discussions from video-recorded lessons are analyzed to study the discourse used to support argumentation by two physics teachers in lower secondary schools. Analysis of discourse includes coding of communicative approach at the episode level and coding of teacher roles of questioning at the level of speaking turns. Student argumentation is also assessed on the basis of dialogicity and complexity of arguments. Findings characterize different ways of orchestrating argumentative discussions. Authoritative episodes were characterized by the presence of the dispenser role, with teachers retaining ownership over ideas and classroom activities to emphasize the correctness of a justification. Dialogic episodes of classroom interaction showed openness to student perspectives, but teachers’ use of questioning roles revealed different ways of orchestrating argumentative discussions. The moderator role granted ownership of ideas to students to either pursue a single student’s argument in more depth or to directly contrast opposing justifications. Less commonly used were the roles of coach and participant, which teachers used to elicit student justifications in more depth or support students in examining the arguments of their peers. Examination of discourse using multiple frameworks revealed differences in teachers’ values and the impact of the use of teacher questioning roles on student contributions to argumentative discussions.


Keywordsnatural sciencesteaching and instructionclassroom workteachersschool childrenlinguistic interactionargumentationdialogicalityroles (expected behaviour)


Contributing organizations


Related projects


Ministry reportingYes

Reporting Year2023

JUFO rating1


Last updated on 2024-15-05 at 13:05